"Adjust Size" vs "Scale"

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

"Adjust Size" vs "Scale"

Joel Sheffield
Hi All,

I must confess to some confusion.  For a long time, I have noticed that the
Image>scale command only adjusts in the X and Y dimension, but does not
change the Z spacing.  Thus, if I wish to rescale a z-series, I have to go
through an additional step of changing the Z distance in the properties
dialog.

Now, according to Wayne, quoted below, the Image>Adjust>Size command will
allow changes in all three dimensions.


> You can do this with the v1.43f daily build using the Image>Adjust>Size
> command, which now has the ability to resize in the Z dimension.


I can see that the two commands are different, in that "scale" allows a
function, while "Size" allows a pixel number.  However, only one of them
allows a Z change.  Is this a bug or a feature?

Joel



Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D
Department of Biology
Temple University
Philadelphia, PA 19122
Voice: 215 204 8839
e-mail: [hidden email]
URL:  http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: "Adjust Size" vs "Scale"

Wayne Rasband
On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:49 PM, JOEL B. SHEFFIELD wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I must confess to some confusion.  For a long time, I have noticed
> that the
> Image>scale command only adjusts in the X and Y dimension, but does not
> change the Z spacing.  Thus, if I wish to rescale a z-series, I have
> to go
> through an additional step of changing the Z distance in the properties
> dialog.
>
> Now, according to Wayne, quoted below, the Image>Adjust>Size command
> will
> allow changes in all three dimensions.
>
>
>> You can do this with the v1.43f daily build using the
>> Image>Adjust>Size
>> command, which now has the ability to resize in the Z dimension.
>
>
> I can see that the two commands are different, in that "scale" allows a
> function, while "Size" allows a pixel number.  However, only one of
> them
> allows a Z change.  Is this a bug or a feature?

The Image>Scale command, in a few days, is going to be able to scale in
the Z dimension.

-wayne
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: "Adjust Size" vs "Scale"

Joel Sheffield
Thanks, Wayne

Joel


On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Wayne Rasband <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:49 PM, JOEL B. SHEFFIELD wrote:
>
>  Hi All,
>>
>> I must confess to some confusion.  For a long time, I have noticed that
>> the
>> Image>scale command only adjusts in the X and Y dimension, but does not
>> change the Z spacing.  Thus, if I wish to rescale a z-series, I have to go
>> through an additional step of changing the Z distance in the properties
>> dialog.
>>
>> Now, according to Wayne, quoted below, the Image>Adjust>Size command will
>> allow changes in all three dimensions.
>>
>>
>>  You can do this with the v1.43f daily build using the Image>Adjust>Size
>>> command, which now has the ability to resize in the Z dimension.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I can see that the two commands are different, in that "scale" allows a
>> function, while "Size" allows a pixel number.  However, only one of them
>> allows a Z change.  Is this a bug or a feature?
>>
>
> The Image>Scale command, in a few days, is going to be able to scale in the
> Z dimension.
>
> -wayne
>



--


Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D
Department of Biology
Temple University
Philadelphia, PA 19122
Voice: 215 204 8839
e-mail: [hidden email]
URL:  http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs