. I am really struggling with image addition and subtraction given me noisy / irreasonable results. I have three images (a) the reference image( dry voids) (b) the time series image( partially filed void) (c) The saturated image( completely filled void). I perform the following arithmetic
1. subtract image A from B to quantify the amount of fluid in void after a certain time 2. subtract image A from C to qualify the voids within the images 3. I ratio the result from 1 to 2 to quantify the realative concetration of fluid in voids at time of acquiring image 2. Problem . When i do my subtraction, i end up having negative pixels, whioch should not occur, how do i eliminate these pixels without compromising my data When i ratio as described in step 3 above, i get values above 1 which is not logical, how do i remove values greater than 1 without compromising my data. I attach 3 images for anyone to please help me out. Thanks href="Reference-+dry+void.tif">Reference-+dry+void.tif8+hours+partially+filled+voids.tifSaturated-filled+voids.tif |
Almost done:
1) ST 5uM? turn off your Chinese software. 2) why a box on the black line for control? 3) replace 1000pA with 1 nA HG >>> On 5/28/2008 at 12:26 AM, in message <[hidden email]>, degus <[hidden email]> wrote: . I am really struggling with image addition and subtraction given me noisy / irreasonable results. I have three images (a) the reference image( dry voids) (b) the time series image( partially filed void) (c) The saturated image( completely filled void). I perform the following arithmetic 1. subtract image A from B to quantify the amount of fluid in void after a certain time 2. subtract image A from C to qualify the voids within the images 3. I ratio the result from 1 to 2 to quantify the realative concetration of fluid in voids at time of acquiring image 2. Problem . When i do my subtraction, i end up having negative pixels, whioch should not occur, how do i eliminate these pixels without compromising my data When i ratio as described in step 3 above, i get values above 1 which is not logical, how do i remove values greater than 1 without compromising my data. I attach 3 images for anyone to please help me out. Thanks href="Reference-+dry+void.tif">Reference-+dry+void.tif http://www.nabble.com/file/p17505032/8%2Bhours%2Bpartially%2Bfilled%2Bvoids.tif 8+hours+partially+filled+voids.tif http://www.nabble.com/file/p17505032/Saturated-filled%2Bvoids.tif Saturated-filled+voids.tif -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Image-processing-tp17505032p17505032.html Sent from the ImageJ mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Please ignore the previous email which was not meant to send to the Group, but to my postdoc, instead. Sorry for the confusion.
HG >>> On 5/28/2008 at 10:27 AM, in message <[hidden email]>, Han Gang Yu <[hidden email]> wrote: Almost done: 1) ST 5uM? turn off your Chinese software. 2) why a box on the black line for control? 3) replace 1000pA with 1 nA HG >>> On 5/28/2008 at 12:26 AM, in message <[hidden email]>, degus <[hidden email]> wrote: . I am really struggling with image addition and subtraction given me noisy / irreasonable results. I have three images (a) the reference image( dry voids) (b) the time series image( partially filed void) (c) The saturated image( completely filled void). I perform the following arithmetic 1. subtract image A from B to quantify the amount of fluid in void after a certain time 2. subtract image A from C to qualify the voids within the images 3. I ratio the result from 1 to 2 to quantify the realative concetration of fluid in voids at time of acquiring image 2. Problem . When i do my subtraction, i end up having negative pixels, whioch should not occur, how do i eliminate these pixels without compromising my data When i ratio as described in step 3 above, i get values above 1 which is not logical, how do i remove values greater than 1 without compromising my data. I attach 3 images for anyone to please help me out. Thanks href="Reference-+dry+void.tif">Reference-+dry+void.tif http://www.nabble.com/file/p17505032/8%2Bhours%2Bpartially%2Bfilled%2Bvoids.tif 8+hours+partially+filled+voids.tif http://www.nabble.com/file/p17505032/Saturated-filled%2Bvoids.tif Saturated-filled+voids.tif -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Image-processing-tp17505032p17505032.html Sent from the ImageJ mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
In reply to this post by Han Gang Yu
Huh?
颠倒?范吨? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards 小卫 Han Gang Yu <[hidden email]> Gesendet von: An ImageJ Interest [hidden email] Group Kopie <[hidden email]. GOV> Thema Re: Image processing 28.05.2008 16:27 Bitte antworten an ImageJ Interest Group <[hidden email]. GOV> Almost done: 1) ST 5uM? turn off your Chinese software. 2) why a box on the black line for control? 3) replace 1000pA with 1 nA HG >>> On 5/28/2008 at 12:26 AM, in message <[hidden email]>, degus <[hidden email]> wrote: . I am really struggling with image addition and subtraction given me noisy / irreasonable results. I have three images (a) the reference image( dry voids) (b) the time series image( partially filed void) (c) The saturated image( completely filled void). I perform the following arithmetic 1. subtract image A from B to quantify the amount of fluid in void after a certain time 2. subtract image A from C to qualify the voids within the images 3. I ratio the result from 1 to 2 to quantify the realative concetration of fluid in voids at time of acquiring image 2. Problem . When i do my subtraction, i end up having negative pixels, whioch should not occur, how do i eliminate these pixels without compromising my data When i ratio as described in step 3 above, i get values above 1 which is not logical, how do i remove values greater than 1 without compromising my data. I attach 3 images for anyone to please help me out. Thanks href="Reference-+dry+void.tif">Reference-+dry+void.tif http://www.nabble.com/file/p17505032/8%2Bhours%2Bpartially%2Bfilled%2Bvoids.tif 8+hours+partially+filled+voids.tif http://www.nabble.com/file/p17505032/Saturated-filled%2Bvoids.tif Saturated-filled+voids.tif -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Image-processing-tp17505032p17505032.html Sent from the ImageJ mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |