Hi Curtis,
Thanks! I'm sure it is somewhere, but could you remind ImageJ users about what will happen to ImageJ support after the full release of ImageJ2? It will help those of us who do the software for our labs to gauge how much effort to put in. If it's 100% backwards compatible, then of course it will be easy, and I know that this is the goal. Wayne, thanks for your incredible help! Cheers, Jeff ************* Jeff Hardin Professor and Chair Department of Zoology University of Wisconsin 1117 W. Johnson St. Madison, WI 53706 Voice: (608) 262-9634 Fax: (608) 262-7319 On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:01 PM, IMAGEJ automatic digest system <[hidden email]> wrote: > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:12:43 -0500 > From: Curtis Rueden <[hidden email]> > Subject: ImageJ 2.0.0-beta5 released > > Hi everyone, > > The ImageJDev team has released the fifth beta of ImageJ2, version 2.0.0- > beta5. -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Hi Jeff,
Sorry for the delay in reply; many of us were busy last week with the ImageJ conference in Luxembourg! > I'm sure it is somewhere, but could you remind ImageJ users about what > will happen to ImageJ support after the full release of ImageJ2? My understanding is that ImageJ1 will continue to be developed and supported by Wayne, both now and after the final release of ImageJ2. At some point that may change, but it is Wayne's prerogative. And of course, ImageJ1 will also continue to be supported by the community via the mailing list. As for ImageJ2, it also is, and will continue to be, supported by the ImageJ2 development team and community. It will continue to bundle the newest release version of ImageJ1 with each release. > It will help those of us who do the software for our labs to gauge how > much effort to put in. Effort to put in... in what sense? Exploring and developing for ImageJ2? Porting ImageJ1 plugins over to ImageJ2? > If it's 100% backwards compatible, then of course it will be easy, and > I know that this is the goal. Our initial stated goal is 100% backwards compatibility. In practice, ImageJ2 has achieved support for existing non-interactive ImageJ1 plugins, macros and scripts. Interactive ImageJ1 plugins, tools, etc., are more difficult, and will probably not be supported in many cases. However, we have ported many of them to the ImageJ2 framework, and plan to write up instructions on how to do so for third party plugins. All of that said, the only way to know for sure whether ImageJ2 works with your group's ImageJ1 plugins is to try it. Regards, Curtis On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Jeff Hardin <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Curtis, > Thanks! I'm sure it is somewhere, but could you remind ImageJ users about > what will happen to ImageJ support after the full release of ImageJ2? It > will help those of us who do the software for our labs to gauge how much > effort to put in. If it's 100% backwards compatible, then of course it will > be easy, and I know that this is the goal. > > Wayne, thanks for your incredible help! > > Cheers, > Jeff > ************* > Jeff Hardin > Professor and Chair > Department of Zoology > University of Wisconsin > 1117 W. Johnson St. > Madison, WI 53706 > Voice: (608) 262-9634 > Fax: (608) 262-7319 > > On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:01 PM, IMAGEJ automatic digest system < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:12:43 -0500 > > From: Curtis Rueden <[hidden email]> > > Subject: ImageJ 2.0.0-beta5 released > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > The ImageJDev team has released the fifth beta of ImageJ2, version 2.0.0- > > beta5. > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |