Hi,
Why is ImageJ in Fiji remaining at 1.49k, whereas the official IJ website ( http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/notes.html) has a 1.49m update since Nov 24? Is this intended? Christophe -- Christophe Leterrier Researcher Axonal Domains Architecture Team CRN2M CNRS UMR 7286 Aix Marseille University, France -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Hi Christophe,
>Is this intended? New ImageJ releases are manually propagated to Fiji. For reference, the ImageJ version used by Fiji is defined in pom-imagej <https://github.com/imagej/pom-imagej/blob/82b3aaa1aa6c9aed7af40bba67348f1a58f2fcc5/pom.xml#L217>. That file will certainly be updated for the new release, but in the mean time users can run "Help > Update ImageJ" to get the latest release. Thanks for pointing out the new version! Best, Mark On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Christophe Leterrier < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > Why is ImageJ in Fiji remaining at 1.49k, whereas the official IJ website ( > http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/notes.html) has a 1.49m update since Nov 24? Is > this intended? > > Christophe > > -- > Christophe Leterrier > Researcher > Axonal Domains Architecture Team > CRN2M CNRS UMR 7286 > Aix Marseille University, France > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the clarification. Due to the very efficient manual propagation, I always thought it was automatically retrieved! Best Regards, Christophe 2014-11-26 21:36 GMT+01:00 Mark Hiner <[hidden email]>: > Hi Christophe, > > >Is this intended? > > New ImageJ releases are manually propagated to Fiji. For reference, the > ImageJ version used by Fiji is defined in pom-imagej > < > https://github.com/imagej/pom-imagej/blob/82b3aaa1aa6c9aed7af40bba67348f1a58f2fcc5/pom.xml#L217 > >. > That file will certainly be updated for the new release, but in the mean > time users can run "Help > Update ImageJ" to get the latest release. > > Thanks for pointing out the new version! > > Best, > Mark > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Christophe Leterrier < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Why is ImageJ in Fiji remaining at 1.49k, whereas the official IJ > website ( > > http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/notes.html) has a 1.49m update since Nov 24? Is > > this intended? > > > > Christophe > > > > -- > > Christophe Leterrier > > Researcher > > Axonal Domains Architecture Team > > CRN2M CNRS UMR 7286 > > Aix Marseille University, France > > > > -- > > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > > > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
In reply to this post by Mark Hiner
Hi Mark & everyone,
> New ImageJ releases are manually propagated to Fiji. Actually, it is much more automated than that, thanks to Johannes's efforts. It is all thanks to this Jenkins job: http://jenkins.imagej.net/job/Synchronize-and-deploy-IJ1/ That job scrapes Wayne's notes.html [1], and updates the ImageJA project's master branch accordingly [2], releases a new version of the ij artifact to Maven Central [3], and then triggers another job [4] which uploads the new ij.jar to the ImageJ update site. It seems that 1.49m was never updated on ImageJA, never released to Maven Central, and hence never uploaded to the update site. Unfortunately, we will not have time to investigate why not until after the Thanksgiving holiday. In the meantime, you can update using the Help > Update ImageJ command. Regards, Curtis P.S. to developers: One thing that is still missing is that the new version of net.imagej:ij is not updated in the pom-imagej project [5], and hence the ImageJ and Fiji builds will not include the new release, resulting in skew between the Maven builds and the ImageJ update site. Of course, we want to correct this in the future. [1] http://imagej.net/notes.html [2] https://github.com/imagej/ImageJA [3] http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22net.imagej%22%20AND%20a%3A%22ij%22 [4] http://jenkins.imagej.net/job/Upload-IJ1-Into-ImageJ/ [5] https://github.com/imagej/pom-imagej On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Mark Hiner <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > >Is this intended? > > New ImageJ releases are manually propagated to Fiji. For reference, the > ImageJ version used by Fiji is defined in pom-imagej > < > https://github.com/imagej/pom-imagej/blob/82b3aaa1aa6c9aed7af40bba67348f1a58f2fcc5/pom.xml#L217 > >. > That file will certainly be updated for the new release, but in the mean > time users can run "Help > Update ImageJ" to get the latest release. > > Thanks for pointing out the new version! > > Best, > Mark > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Christophe Leterrier < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Why is ImageJ in Fiji remaining at 1.49k, whereas the official IJ > website ( > > http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/notes.html) has a 1.49m update since Nov 24? Is > > this intended? > > > > Christophe > > > > -- > > Christophe Leterrier > > Researcher > > Axonal Domains Architecture Team > > CRN2M CNRS UMR 7286 > > Aix Marseille University, France > > > > -- > > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > > > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
In reply to this post by lechristophe
Hi again,
> we will not have time to investigate why not until after the > Thanksgiving holiday. I take it back -- kicking the Jenkins job manually triggered the update. So enjoy the shiny new ij-1.49m.jar. ;-) That said, we'll still need to investigate why the job stopped firing automatically like it is supposed to. Regards, Curtis On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Christophe Leterrier < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for the clarification. Due to the very efficient manual propagation, > I always thought it was automatically retrieved! > > Best Regards, > > Christophe > > 2014-11-26 21:36 GMT+01:00 Mark Hiner <[hidden email]>: > > > Hi Christophe, > > > > >Is this intended? > > > > New ImageJ releases are manually propagated to Fiji. For reference, the > > ImageJ version used by Fiji is defined in pom-imagej > > < > > > https://github.com/imagej/pom-imagej/blob/82b3aaa1aa6c9aed7af40bba67348f1a58f2fcc5/pom.xml#L217 > > >. > > That file will certainly be updated for the new release, but in the mean > > time users can run "Help > Update ImageJ" to get the latest release. > > > > Thanks for pointing out the new version! > > > > Best, > > Mark > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Christophe Leterrier < > > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Why is ImageJ in Fiji remaining at 1.49k, whereas the official IJ > > website ( > > > http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/notes.html) has a 1.49m update since Nov 24? > Is > > > this intended? > > > > > > Christophe > > > > > > -- > > > Christophe Leterrier > > > Researcher > > > Axonal Domains Architecture Team > > > CRN2M CNRS UMR 7286 > > > Aix Marseille University, France > > > > > > -- > > > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > > > > > > > -- > > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > > > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
In reply to this post by Mark Hiner
Hi,
I just would like to point out that it looks like ImageJ in Fiji is again a few versions behind the current 1.49p, in case this was not intended. Thanks for all the work! Christophe On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Mark Hiner <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > >Is this intended? > > New ImageJ releases are manually propagated to Fiji. For reference, the > ImageJ version used by Fiji is defined in pom-imagej > < > https://github.com/imagej/pom-imagej/blob/82b3aaa1aa6c9aed7af40bba67348f1a58f2fcc5/pom.xml#L217 > >. > That file will certainly be updated for the new release, but in the mean > time users can run "Help > Update ImageJ" to get the latest release. > > Thanks for pointing out the new version! > > Best, > Mark > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Christophe Leterrier < > [hidden email]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Why is ImageJ in Fiji remaining at 1.49k, whereas the official IJ > website ( > > http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/notes.html) has a 1.49m update since Nov 24? Is > > this intended? > > > > Christophe > > > > -- > > Christophe Leterrier > > Researcher > > Axonal Domains Architecture Team > > CRN2M CNRS UMR 7286 > > Aix Marseille University, France > > > > -- > > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > > > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Hi Christophe,
>I just would like to point out that it looks like ImageJ in Fiji is again a few versions behind the current 1.49p Curtis mentioned previously that the automated synchronization had been failing. This is because the synchronization job looked at URL timestamps to test for changes, and that test had been disabled. It has now been re-enabled and should thus run automatically in the future. I manually synchronized to 1.49p - which should now be installed with Help > Update Fiji. Thanks for pointing this out again! Best, Mark On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Christophe Leterrier < [hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just would like to point out that it looks like ImageJ in Fiji is again > a few versions behind the current 1.49p, in case this was not intended. > > Thanks for all the work! > > Christophe > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Mark Hiner <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi Christophe, >> >> >Is this intended? >> >> New ImageJ releases are manually propagated to Fiji. For reference, the >> ImageJ version used by Fiji is defined in pom-imagej >> < >> https://github.com/imagej/pom-imagej/blob/82b3aaa1aa6c9aed7af40bba67348f1a58f2fcc5/pom.xml#L217 >> >. >> That file will certainly be updated for the new release, but in the mean >> time users can run "Help > Update ImageJ" to get the latest release. >> >> Thanks for pointing out the new version! >> >> Best, >> Mark >> >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Christophe Leterrier < >> [hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Why is ImageJ in Fiji remaining at 1.49k, whereas the official IJ >> website ( >> > http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/notes.html) has a 1.49m update since Nov 24? >> Is >> > this intended? >> > >> > Christophe >> > >> > -- >> > Christophe Leterrier >> > Researcher >> > Axonal Domains Architecture Team >> > CRN2M CNRS UMR 7286 >> > Aix Marseille University, France >> > >> > -- >> > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html >> > >> >> -- >> ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html >> > > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |