In Situ Hybridization

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

In Situ Hybridization

Van Hoomissen, Jacqueline
Greetings,
 
I'm new to the list but I'm wondering if anyone out there is using ImageJ for analysis of x-ray film from in situ hybridization.  We are currently doing in situ with rat brain and we want to analyze our films with Image J.  Can anyone suggest a good light box, camera, and lens that works well with Image J for our purposes?
 
Thanks
 
Jacquie Van Hoomissen
 
University of Portland
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: In Situ Hybridization

Philip Ershler
On Jun 15, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Van Hoomissen, Jacqueline wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I'm new to the list but I'm wondering if anyone out there is using  
> ImageJ for analysis of x-ray film from in situ hybridization.  We  
> are currently doing in situ with rat brain and we want to analyze  
> our films with Image J.  Can anyone suggest a good light box,  
> camera, and lens that works well with Image J for our purposes?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacquie Van Hoomissen
>
> University of Portland

Hi,
        I'd suggest using a flat bed scanner that is set up to scan  
transparencies. I think you'll get much better results than the light  
box camera approach.

HTH,

Phil
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: In Situ Hybridization

Bo de Lange
On 15 Jun 2006, at 19:36, Philip Ershler wrote:

> On Jun 15, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Van Hoomissen, Jacqueline wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I'm new to the list but I'm wondering if anyone out there is using  
>> ImageJ for analysis of x-ray film from in situ hybridization.  We  
>> are currently doing in situ with rat brain and we want to analyze  
>> our films with Image J.  Can anyone suggest a good light box,  
>> camera, and lens that works well with Image J for our purposes?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacquie Van Hoomissen
>>
>> University of Portland
>
> Hi,
> I'd suggest using a flat bed scanner that is set up to scan  
> transparencies. I think you'll get much better results than the  
> light box camera approach.
>
> HTH,
>
> Phil

At least it is a cheaper way to get results at least as good. I've  
done quite some in situs myself with 33P labelled probes. We have an  
MCID set-up with dedicated lightbox and Dage CCD camera, but the  
recently acquired Epson 4990 A4 flatbed scanner works just as well,  
maybe even better. And it's a lot easier: instead of capturing images  
of single sections, you can capture a whole film in one scan (approx  
5 mins when scanning at 1600 ppi). Invest in a number of 14C  
microscales from Amersham and you're up and running.

Bo