I get a very slight different value if I calculate the integrated
optical density if I multiply the mean optical density by ROI area value
compared to the value imageJ outputs.
Is that a rounding problem? Or maybe does imageJ consider stdev error in
the computation?
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 12:51 +0200, S. Pagakis (nimr) wrote:
> If the image is uncalibrated (ie in pixels) then the integrated
> density IS the raw sum. Otherwise it is normalised by the area.
>
>
> On 24 Feb 2009, at 12:33, Andrew James Bell wrote:
>
> > I would like the actual sum of the gray values, as opposed to
> > manipulated
> > data. The raw data as it were. In order to perform the ID
> > calculation the
> > macro must calculate the sum, so it should be possible to display
> > the raw
> > sum.
>
> *********************************
> Stamatis Pagakis Ph.D.
> Biological Imaging Unit
> Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens
> Soranou Efessiou 4, Athens 115 27 - Greece
> M: +306946644955 W: +302106597481
> FAX: +302106597545
[hidden email]
--
Hugo Arruda de Moura Torres
==================================
Departamento de Biofísica
Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Rua Botucatu 862 7o. andar
CEP 04023-062 Vila Clementino
São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Tel:+55 (11) 5576 4530 r.220
Fax: 55 11 5571 5780