Greetings all,
A colleague of mine has been interested in the processing option in our old Leica SP1 software that generates a rotating stack image in which the different positions in the stack are mapped to a color gradient. That is, the top of the stack is red, and the bottom is blue, with a gradient between them. I have looked for an implementation of this in the ImageJ materials, so far without luck. Does any have a suggestion, or am I missing something really obvious? Joel Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D Department of Biology Temple University Philadelphia, PA 19122 Voice: 215 204 8839 e-mail: [hidden email] URL: http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Hi Joel,
There are 2 options I know of. In Fiji, you can do Image > Hyperstacks > Temporal Color-Code. This lets you pick the colors and generate a reference scale. The Fiji Cookbook plugin package includes "Z Code Stack" which will generate a color-coded stack. You can then project it with your method of choice (such as Image > Stacks > Z Project and choose Max Intensity). I don't see a way to choose the colors there. Hope this helps, Theresa On May 23, 2014, at 1:21 PM, "JOEL B. SHEFFIELD" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Greetings all, > > A colleague of mine has been interested in the processing option in our old > Leica SP1 software that generates a rotating stack image in which the > different positions in the stack are mapped to a color gradient. That is, > the top of the stack is red, and the bottom is blue, with a gradient > between them. I have looked for an implementation of this in the ImageJ > materials, so far without luck. Does any have a suggestion, or am I > missing something really obvious? > > Joel > > > Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D > Department of Biology > Temple University > Philadelphia, PA 19122 > Voice: 215 204 8839 > e-mail: [hidden email] > URL: http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > ------------------------------------ Theresa Swayne, Ph.D. Associate Research Scientist Manager, Confocal and Specialized Microscopy Shared Resource Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University 1130 Saint Nicholas Ave, 222A New York, NY 10032 212-851-4613 [hidden email] http://hiccc.columbia.edu/research/sharedresources/confocal -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
In reply to this post by Joel Sheffield
Hi Joel,
> A colleague of mine has been interested in the processing option in > our old Leica SP1 software that generates a rotating stack image in > which the different positions in the stack are mapped to a color > gradient. That is, the top of the stack is red, and the bottom is > blue, with a gradient between them. That sounded like such a fun project, that I wrote a quick plugin: https://gist.github.com/ctrueden/fe00e8dd2034f37273f0 HTH, Curtis On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:21 PM, JOEL B. SHEFFIELD <[hidden email]> wrote: > Greetings all, > > A colleague of mine has been interested in the processing option in our old > Leica SP1 software that generates a rotating stack image in which the > different positions in the stack are mapped to a color gradient. That is, > the top of the stack is red, and the bottom is blue, with a gradient > between them. I have looked for an implementation of this in the ImageJ > materials, so far without luck. Does any have a suggestion, or am I > missing something really obvious? > > Joel > > > Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D > Department of Biology > Temple University > Philadelphia, PA 19122 > Voice: 215 204 8839 > e-mail: [hidden email] > URL: http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
In reply to this post by Joel Sheffield
On Friday 23 May 2014 13:21:16 JOEL B. SHEFFIELD wrote:
> A colleague of mine has been interested in the processing option in our old > Leica SP1 software that generates a rotating stack image in which the > different positions in the stack are mapped to a color gradient. That is, > the top of the stack is red, and the bottom is blue, with a gradient > between them. I have looked for an implementation of this in the ImageJ > materials, so far without luck. Does any have a suggestion, or am I > missing something really obvious? I tried Curtis' plugin but I cannot compile it under IJ1. This macro produces (I hope) the same results. setBatchMode(true); a=getTitle(); run("RGB Color"); div=nSlices; for(i=0;i<div;i++){ selectWindow(a); setSlice(i+1); run("Duplicate...", "title=_b"); run("HSB Stack"); setSlice(1); run("Set...", "value="+((256/div)*i)+" slice"); setSlice(2); run("Set...", "value=255 slice"); run("RGB Color"); imageCalculator("Copy", a ,"_b"); selectWindow("_b"); close(); } setBatchMode(false); Cheers Gabriel -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Hi Gabriel,
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Gabriel Landini wrote: > On Friday 23 May 2014 13:21:16 JOEL B. SHEFFIELD wrote: > > A colleague of mine has been interested in the processing option in our old > > Leica SP1 software that generates a rotating stack image in which the > > different positions in the stack are mapped to a color gradient. That is, > > the top of the stack is red, and the bottom is blue, with a gradient > > between them. I have looked for an implementation of this in the ImageJ > > materials, so far without luck. Does any have a suggestion, or am I > > missing something really obvious? > > I tried Curtis' plugin but I cannot compile it under IJ1. If it does not compile, surely there is some compile error. Could you please paste that into a reply? > This macro produces (I hope) the same results. Not quite... Curtis' opens the 3D Viewer and animates the result for extra bling. Ciao, Dscho -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
On Friday 23 May 2014 22:55:24 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2014, Gabriel Landini wrote: > > I tried Curtis' plugin but I cannot compile it under IJ1. > > If it does not compile, surely there is some compile error. Could you > please paste that into a reply? Wayne kindly resolved the compilation problem, but now there is another issue. ImageJ 1.49b9; Java 1.7.0_51 [64-bit]; Linux 3.11.10-11-desktop; 120MB of 983MB (12%) java.lang.NullPointerException at ij3d.ContentCreator.getImages(ContentCreator.java:156) at ij3d.ContentCreator.createContent(ContentCreator.java:63) at ij3d.Image3DUniverse.addContent(Image3DUniverse.java:848) at ij3d.ImageJ3DViewer.add(ImageJ3DViewer.java:137) at Colorized_Rotation.run(Colorized_Rotation.java:39) at ij.plugin.PlugInExecuter.runCompiledPlugin(Compiler.java:324) at ij.plugin.PlugInExecuter.run(Compiler.java:313) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) I wonder if the 3d viewer version I have in this machine is not the expected one. I checked the file dates inside the jar in IJ and Fiji and the IJ one is a bit newer than the Fiji one (11/9/2012 vs 24/5/2012) > > This macro produces (I hope) the same results. > > Not quite... Curtis' opens the 3D Viewer and animates the result for extra > bling. Oh, well. I said "I hope", since I could not compile it, I could only more or less guess what it does. Below is the macro with the missing bling,although I still do not know if it does the same thing. Thanks for looking into this. Cheers Gabriel /////////////////////////////// setBatchMode(true); a=getTitle(); run("RGB Color"); div=nSlices; for(i=0;i<div;i++){ selectWindow(a); setSlice(i+1); run("Duplicate...", "title=_b"); run("HSB Stack"); setSlice(1); run("Set...", "value="+((256/div)*i)+" slice"); setSlice(2); run("Set...", "value=255 slice"); run("RGB Color"); imageCalculator("Copy", a ,"_b"); selectWindow("_b"); close(); } setBatchMode(false); run("3D Viewer"); call("ij3d.ImageJ3DViewer.setCoordinateSystem", "false"); call("ij3d.ImageJ3DViewer.add", a, "None", a , "0", "true", "true", "true", "2", "0"); call("ij3d.ImageJ3DViewer.startAnimate"); /////////////////////////////// -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Folks,
Thank you so much for doing this. As always, I have learned a lot by reading both of the approaches. As I understand it, Gabriel's increments the values along an HSV spectrum, and Curtis directly increments the color code values -- So far, I've run the macro version, and it seems to be acting as designed. Again, thank you all. Joel Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D Department of Biology Temple University Philadelphia, PA 19122 Voice: 215 204 8839 e-mail: [hidden email] URL: http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Gabriel Landini <[hidden email]>wrote: > On Friday 23 May 2014 22:55:24 Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Fri, 23 May 2014, Gabriel Landini wrote: > > > I tried Curtis' plugin but I cannot compile it under IJ1. > > > > If it does not compile, surely there is some compile error. Could you > > please paste that into a reply? > > Wayne kindly resolved the compilation problem, but now there is another > issue. > > ImageJ 1.49b9; Java 1.7.0_51 [64-bit]; Linux 3.11.10-11-desktop; 120MB of > 983MB (12%) > > java.lang.NullPointerException > at ij3d.ContentCreator.getImages(ContentCreator.java:156) > at ij3d.ContentCreator.createContent(ContentCreator.java:63) > at ij3d.Image3DUniverse.addContent(Image3DUniverse.java:848) > at ij3d.ImageJ3DViewer.add(ImageJ3DViewer.java:137) > at Colorized_Rotation.run(Colorized_Rotation.java:39) > at ij.plugin.PlugInExecuter.runCompiledPlugin(Compiler.java:324) > at ij.plugin.PlugInExecuter.run(Compiler.java:313) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) > > I wonder if the 3d viewer version I have in this machine is not the > expected > one. I checked the file dates inside the jar in IJ and Fiji and the IJ one > is > a bit newer than the Fiji one (11/9/2012 vs 24/5/2012) > > > > This macro produces (I hope) the same results. > > > > Not quite... Curtis' opens the 3D Viewer and animates the result for > extra > > bling. > > Oh, well. I said "I hope", since I could not compile it, I could only more > or > less guess what it does. > Below is the macro with the missing bling,although I still do not know if > it > does the same thing. > > Thanks for looking into this. > Cheers > > Gabriel > > /////////////////////////////// > setBatchMode(true); > a=getTitle(); > run("RGB Color"); > div=nSlices; > for(i=0;i<div;i++){ > selectWindow(a); > setSlice(i+1); > run("Duplicate...", "title=_b"); > run("HSB Stack"); > setSlice(1); > run("Set...", "value="+((256/div)*i)+" slice"); > setSlice(2); > run("Set...", "value=255 slice"); > run("RGB Color"); > imageCalculator("Copy", a ,"_b"); > selectWindow("_b"); > close(); > } > setBatchMode(false); > run("3D Viewer"); > call("ij3d.ImageJ3DViewer.setCoordinateSystem", "false"); > call("ij3d.ImageJ3DViewer.add", a, "None", a , "0", "true", "true", "true", > "2", "0"); > call("ij3d.ImageJ3DViewer.startAnimate"); > /////////////////////////////// > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
In reply to this post by Gabriel Landini
On Friday 23 May 2014 23:37:02 I wrote:
> Wayne kindly resolved the compilation problem, but now there is another > issue. For some reason I can't explain, now I can compile that plugin too (in another machine, but same setup). One of those mysteries, I guess... -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Hi Gabriel,
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Gabriel Landini wrote: > On Friday 23 May 2014 23:37:02 I wrote: > > Wayne kindly resolved the compilation problem, but now there is another > > issue. > > For some reason I can't explain, now I can compile that plugin too (in > another machine, but same setup). One of those mysteries, I guess... Well, given that I was not allowed to see the compile error nor Wayne's resolution, it is a much bigger mystery to me than it is to you. As you know, I am happy to help you, when given a chance. But as you can compile it on another machine, I guess that solves yournproblem. So: less work for me. Ciao, Johannes -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |