Name that LUT!

[Michael Doube]

Hi all

I'm preparing an old figure for publication and want to add a LUT scale
to it, but I can't find the LUT it was created with.

http://doube.org/images/moduli_map.jpg

I've checked out all the included LUT's and the ones on
http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/download/luts/, but nothing seems to fit.

I also can't rip the LUT out of the image since it is RGB (a projection
of a surface map from Kai's 3D surface viewer).

Does anyone recognise the LUT?  Dark blue is low, red is high and I
think there are only 8 or so colours in it.

It goes, dark blue, light blue, white, green, yellow, orange(?), red.

Mike

[dscho]

Hi,

On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Michael Doube wrote:

> I'm preparing an old figure for publication and want to add a LUT scale
> to it, but I can't find the LUT it was created with.
>
> http://doube.org/images/moduli_map.jpg
>
> I've checked out all the included LUT's and the ones on
> http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/download/luts/, but nothing seems to fit.
>
> I also can't rip the LUT out of the image since it is RGB (a projection
> of a surface map from Kai's 3D surface viewer).
>
> Does anyone recognise the LUT?  Dark blue is low, red is high and I think
> there are only 8 or so colours in it.
>
> It goes, dark blue, light blue, white, green, yellow, orange(?), red.

I _think_ it is the good old heat map, sometimes called "physics":

http://pacific.mpi-cbg.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=VIB.git;a=blob_plain;f=physics.lut;hb=6840872c6a492e31caa453a6776d1e9fac26f58d

Ciao,
Dscho

[Michael Doube]

physics.lut is very close, but doesn't have the white band in the middle.

I will keep looking, or just edit physics.lut to about what it should be.

Mike

Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Michael Doube wrote:
>
>> I'm preparing an old figure for publication and want to add a LUT scale
>> to it, but I can't find the LUT it was created with.
>>
>> http://doube.org/images/moduli_map.jpg
>>
>> I've checked out all the included LUT's and the ones on
>> http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/download/luts/, but nothing seems to fit.
>>
>> I also can't rip the LUT out of the image since it is RGB (a projection
>> of a surface map from Kai's 3D surface viewer).
>>
>> Does anyone recognise the LUT?  Dark blue is low, red is high and I think
>> there are only 8 or so colours in it.
>>
>> It goes, dark blue, light blue, white, green, yellow, orange(?), red.
>
> I _think_ it is the good old heat map, sometimes called "physics":
>
> http://pacific.mpi-cbg.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=VIB.git;a=blob_plain;f=physics.lut;hb=6840872c6a492e31caa453a6776d1e9fac26f58d
>
> Ciao,
> Dscho
>

--
Dr Michael Doube  BPhil BVSc PhD MRCVS
Research Associate
Department of Bioengineering
Imperial College London
South Kensington Campus
London  SW7 2AZ
United Kingdom

[Gabriel Landini]

On Wednesday 15 July 2009  16:06:24 Michael Doube wrote:
> physics.lut is very close, but doesn't have the white band in the middle.
>
> I will keep looking, or just edit physics.lut to about what it should be.

I think that it is closer to the Thermal LUT from the Interactive 3D surface
plot, but that one also has violet...


Cheers

G.

[John Oreopoulos]

Hi,

I'm using ImageJ's 3D project stack function to do a 360 degree  
rotation of a 512x512 confocal microscopy stack with 61 vertical  
slices. I choose 360 degree rotation about the y-axis with 5 degree  
increments. When the rotation stack is complete, it has new  
dimensions of 512x524 pixels and not 512x512 pixels. If I do a  
rotation about the x-axis instead, the pixel dimensions come out as  
524x512. Is this a bug? Why are these extra rows or columns of empty  
pixels being created by this function?

John Oreopoulos

[Bill Mohler]

Think of Pythagoras here...

You're working with a cube.  3D project shows you the whole cube from
all angles projected.

John Oreopoulos wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm using ImageJ's 3D project stack function to do a 360 degree
> rotation of a 512x512 confocal microscopy stack with 61 vertical
> slices. I choose 360 degree rotation about the y-axis with 5 degree
> increments. When the rotation stack is complete, it has new dimensions
> of 512x524 pixels and not 512x512 pixels. If I do a rotation about the
> x-axis instead, the pixel dimensions come out as 524x512. Is this a
> bug? Why are these extra rows or columns of empty pixels being created
> by this function?
>
> John Oreopoulos
>

[Michael Doube]

Yes!

That is it, thanks Gabriel!

Gabriel Landini wrote:

> On Wednesday 15 July 2009  16:06:24 Michael Doube wrote:
>> physics.lut is very close, but doesn't have the white band in the middle.
>>
>> I will keep looking, or just edit physics.lut to about what it should be.
>
> I think that it is closer to the Thermal LUT from the Interactive 3D surface
> plot, but that one also has violet...
>
>
> Cheers
>
> G.

[Michael Doube]

If anyone is interested I have generated an ImageJ LUT "thermal.lut"
from the code in the surface viewer plugin.

http://doube.org/files/thermal.lut

Mike

Michael Doube wrote:

> Yes!
>
> That is it, thanks Gabriel!
>
> Gabriel Landini wrote:
>> On Wednesday 15 July 2009  16:06:24 Michael Doube wrote:
>>> physics.lut is very close, but doesn't have the white band in the middle.
>>>
>>> I will keep looking, or just edit physics.lut to about what it should be.
>> I think that it is closer to the Thermal LUT from the Interactive 3D surface
>> plot, but that one also has violet...
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> G.