Hi on the list,
since the update to ImageJ 1.42q I experience an unpleasant behavior of ImageJ.exe (WinXP): Every time I open an image fron the explorer by double-clicking, a new instance of ImageJ is started. This is quite nasty and used to be different. In former versions of ImageJ all files were opened in the same instance. Is it possible to go back to the previous mode? Cheers, Reinhard. -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 |
High Reinhard,
check "Run socket listener" in Edit>Options>Misc. From the 1.42p release notes: Added the "Run socket listener" option to the Edit>Options>Misc dialog. Enabling this option prevents multiple copies of ImageJ from starting but it can cause a security alert when ImageJ starts. From the online documentation: Enable Run socket listener and ImageJ will use sockets to prevent multiple instances from being launched. On Windows, this avoids the problem where another copy of ImageJ starts each time an image is dragged and dropped on the ImageJ icon. It also prevents multiple instances when running ImageJ from the command line. Note that you may get a security alert the first time ImageJ starts with this option enabled. ImageJ does not require external socket access so it is okay to deny it access in the security alert. Michael ________________________________________________________________ Michael Schmid email: [hidden email] Institut fuer Allgemeine Physik, Technische Universitaet Wien Wiedner Hauptstr. 8-10/134, A 1040 Wien, Austria Tel. +43 1 58801-13452 or -13453, Fax +43 1 58801 13499 ________________________________________________________________ On 10 Jun 2009, at 17:04, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote: > Hi on the list, > > since the update to ImageJ 1.42q I experience an unpleasant > behavior of ImageJ.exe (WinXP): Every time I open an image fron the > explorer by double-clicking, a new instance of ImageJ is started. > > This is quite nasty and used to be different. In former versions of > ImageJ all files were opened in the same instance. Is it possible > to go back to the previous mode? > > Cheers, > > Reinhard. > |
Hi Martin,
that was very helpful! Thank you, Reinhard. -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:33:13 +0200 > Von: Michael Schmid <[hidden email]> > An: [hidden email] > Betreff: Re: Open Image in Existing Instance > High Reinhard, > > check "Run socket listener" in Edit>Options>Misc. > > From the 1.42p release notes: > Added the "Run socket listener" option to the Edit>Options>Misc > dialog. Enabling this option prevents multiple copies of ImageJ from > starting but it can cause a security alert when ImageJ starts. > > From the online documentation: > Enable Run socket listener and ImageJ will use sockets to prevent > multiple instances from being launched. On Windows, this avoids the > problem where another copy of ImageJ starts each time an image is > dragged and dropped on the ImageJ icon. It also prevents multiple > instances when running ImageJ from the command line. Note that you > may get a security alert the first time ImageJ starts with this > option enabled. ImageJ does not require external socket access so it > is okay to deny it access in the security alert. > > Michael > ________________________________________________________________ > Michael Schmid email: [hidden email] > Institut fuer Allgemeine Physik, Technische Universitaet Wien > Wiedner Hauptstr. 8-10/134, A 1040 Wien, Austria > Tel. +43 1 58801-13452 or -13453, Fax +43 1 58801 13499 > ________________________________________________________________ > > On 10 Jun 2009, at 17:04, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote: > > > Hi on the list, > > > > since the update to ImageJ 1.42q I experience an unpleasant > > behavior of ImageJ.exe (WinXP): Every time I open an image fron the > > explorer by double-clicking, a new instance of ImageJ is started. > > > > This is quite nasty and used to be different. In former versions of > > ImageJ all files were opened in the same instance. Is it possible > > to go back to the previous mode? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Reinhard. > > -- GMX FreeDSL Komplettanschluss mit DSL 6.000 Flatrate und Telefonanschluss für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |