I have sets of images that vary in overall background intensity and I was
wondering if there was a quick fix that could normalize the backgrounds of all the images to zero (or close to zero), while removing the corresponding artificial intensity from the cells in the images. I have used the subtract background function of imageJ with various parameters for the rolling ball radius but I am wondering if there is a more accurate way. I have also tried some of the plugins on the internet for background correction but so far with the parameters I have used I haven't seen any good results. Any help here would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Naveen |
There is a free, easy to use program called Image Arithmetic that will do
the job. It can be downloaded from http://www.t3i.nl/myblog/?page_id=7 Ralph Common ----- Original Message ----- From: "Naveen Krishnan" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:16 PM Subject: Subtracting Background Problem > I have sets of images that vary in overall background intensity and I was > wondering if there was a quick fix that could normalize the backgrounds of > all the images to zero (or close to zero), while removing the corresponding > artificial intensity from the cells in the images. I have used the subtract > background function of imageJ with various parameters for the rolling ball > radius but I am wondering if there is a more accurate way. I have also tried > some of the plugins on the internet for background correction but so far > with the parameters I have used I haven't seen any good results. Any help > here would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Naveen > |
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Ralph Common wrote: > There is a free, easy to use program called Image Arithmetic that will > do the job. It can be downloaded from > > http://www.t3i.nl/myblog/?page_id=7 And sure enough, this program is Windows-only. Sigh, Dscho |
In reply to this post by Ralph Common
Were you referring to performing subtractions using the mask of a background
as image2 and the original image as image1 or do you know a better way to subtract out the background for a large number of images using this program? Thanks, Naveen On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Ralph Common <[hidden email]> wrote: > There is a free, easy to use program called Image Arithmetic that will do > the job. It can be downloaded from > > http://www.t3i.nl/myblog/?page_id=7 > > Ralph Common > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Naveen Krishnan" <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:16 PM > Subject: Subtracting Background Problem > > > > I have sets of images that vary in overall background intensity and I > was > > wondering if there was a quick fix that could normalize the backgrounds > of > > all the images to zero (or close to zero), while removing the > corresponding > > artificial intensity from the cells in the images. I have used the > subtract > > background function of imageJ with various parameters for the rolling > ball > > radius but I am wondering if there is a more accurate way. I have also > tried > > some of the plugins on the internet for background correction but so far > > with the parameters I have used I haven't seen any good results. Any > help > > here would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Naveen > > > |
In reply to this post by dscho
Hi Dscho,
> http://www.t3i.nl/myblog/?page_id=7 > > And sure enough, this program is Windows-only. > I tried installing it on Ubuntu Gutsy under WINE with a fake Windows (i.e., not an actual Windows install) and it seems to work fine. -Curtis On Feb 20, 2008 6:07 AM, Johannes Schindelin <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Ralph Common wrote: > > > There is a free, easy to use program called Image Arithmetic that will > > do the job. It can be downloaded from > > > > http://www.t3i.nl/myblog/?page_id=7 > > And sure enough, this program is Windows-only. > > Sigh, > Dscho > |
> > There is a free, easy to use program called Image Arithmetic that will
> > do the job. It can be downloaded from > > > > http://www.t3i.nl/myblog/?page_id=7 I am curious... what can this do that IJ cannot? Cheers, G. |
In reply to this post by ctrueden
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Curtis Rueden wrote: > > http://www.t3i.nl/myblog/?page_id=7 > > > > And sure enough, this program is Windows-only. > > I tried installing it on Ubuntu Gutsy under WINE with a fake Windows > (i.e., not an actual Windows install) and it seems to work fine. Well, try that on a PowerPC Mac. Or on a SPARC Solaris. Or on HP-UX. The whole _point_ of ImageJ being written in Java is that you can run it almost everywhere. And yes, the nicest clusters I know are still SPARC clusters. I would not even be surprised if ImageJ worked on my mobile phone. Try that with said Windows program. Ciao, Dscho |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |