Dear All,
I'd like to evaluate the available open source 3D volume rendering software packages. But to challenge the software, I would like to come close to the limits of current dataset size in X/Y/Z/C, i.e. have high 3D resolution with multiple channels. Are there datasets with very high resolution available? Interesting is either a big volume like 1024 x 1024 x 1024 or more, or a large X/Y area with some Z-depth like 10000 x 10000 x 10 or more. If there are multiple channels its even better! I do not mind so much the sample type and data source, confocal or super-resolution or anything is interesting. Currently with the help of the list archive, I found the excellent resource https://loci.wisc.edu/software/sample-data and this gives a good start, but the maximum Z resolution there is 70 planes on a 512^2 image dataset (albeit with time). All the best, Mario Emmenlauer PS: I will cross-post this to the Confocal Microscopy List at [hidden email] so interested readers may find further responses in their list archive. -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Hi Mario,
I wrote a bead simulator some time ago, might this help? It can do any size you want for testing … Cheers, Stephan --- Dr. Stephan Preibisch Group Leader Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) Building 89, 1.08b email: [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]> web: http://preibischlab.mdc-berlin.de On 11. May 2017, at 12:36, Mario Emmenlauer <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: Dear All, I'd like to evaluate the available open source 3D volume rendering software packages. But to challenge the software, I would like to come close to the limits of current dataset size in X/Y/Z/C, i.e. have high 3D resolution with multiple channels. Are there datasets with very high resolution available? Interesting is either a big volume like 1024 x 1024 x 1024 or more, or a large X/Y area with some Z-depth like 10000 x 10000 x 10 or more. If there are multiple channels its even better! I do not mind so much the sample type and data source, confocal or super-resolution or anything is interesting. Currently with the help of the list archive, I found the excellent resource https://loci.wisc.edu/software/sample-data and this gives a good start, but the maximum Z resolution there is 70 planes on a 512^2 image dataset (albeit with time). All the best, Mario Emmenlauer PS: I will cross-post this to the Confocal Microscopy List at [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]> so interested readers may find further responses in their list archive. -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Hi Stephan,
ah, I recall that you showed this at the hackaton! Completely forgot about it! I will use this if I can not find real data, but for the sake of the example I'd slightly prefer real data (i.e. to see if there are differences to visualize tissue deeper inside the sample, or maybe obscure data formats that impact the data quality or rendering). All the best, Mario On 11.05.2017 12:58, [hidden email] wrote: > Hi Mario, > > I wrote a bead simulator some time ago, might this help? It can do any size you want for testing … > > Cheers, > Stephan > --- > > Dr. Stephan Preibisch > Group Leader > > Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) > Building 89, 1.08b > > email: [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]> > web: http://preibischlab.mdc-berlin.de > > On 11. May 2017, at 12:36, Mario Emmenlauer <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > > Dear All, > > I'd like to evaluate the available open source 3D volume rendering > software packages. But to challenge the software, I would like to come > close to the limits of current dataset size in X/Y/Z/C, i.e. have > high 3D resolution with multiple channels. Are there datasets with > very high resolution available? Interesting is either a big volume > like 1024 x 1024 x 1024 or more, or a large X/Y area with some Z-depth > like 10000 x 10000 x 10 or more. If there are multiple channels its > even better! I do not mind so much the sample type and data source, > confocal or super-resolution or anything is interesting. > > Currently with the help of the list archive, I found the excellent > resource https://loci.wisc.edu/software/sample-data and this gives a > good start, but the maximum Z resolution there is 70 planes on a 512^2 > image dataset (albeit with time). > > All the best, > > Mario Emmenlauer Viele Gruesse, Mario Emmenlauer -- BioDataAnalysis GmbH, Mario Emmenlauer Tel. Buero: +49-89-74677203 Balanstr. 43 mailto: memmenlauer * biodataanalysis.de D-81669 München http://www.biodataanalysis.de/ -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |