It seems to me, without doing the measurements, that you may be having
problems in the conversion from rgb to 8-bit. The actual conversion is somewhat complicated, since each of the channels are weighted differently in the calculation of the grey values. If you are actually interested in the foliage, as measured by green and black in the original, I would suggest that you try to separate out the channels, rather than use a general conversion. Use Image>colors>split channels, and then select the green channel. Then carry out your threshold and measurements, etc. Alternatively, you can use Gabriel Landini's color deconvolution plugin to select more accurately. Best of luck. Joel On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Larry Nolan <[hidden email]> wrote: > Working with a set of 1000 images from ten years ago now; I've succesfully > processed images from this summer with the macro I completed. > > Each old Jpeg image is 320x240. All were taken with the same camera. > > I'm worried that there is something different in some of the files that is > causing my macro not to process the images correctly. I've randomly pulled > three images and used this macro to analyze them to find the canopy cover > (leaves and branches). > > Here's the macro; I open the file twice so I can compare the original with > the thresholded result: > > dir = getDirectory("Choose a Directory "); > list = getFileList(dir); > setOption("display labels", true); > > for (i=0; i<list.length; i++) { > path = dir+list[i]; > showProgress(i, list.length); > open(path); open(path); > > run("8-bit"); > setAutoThreshold(); > run("Measure"); > } > > After running the macro on a folder with the three files (attached in order > below): > > File 11.jpg has the sky selected as red, not the foliage; area results > wrong > File 61.jpg appears to be OK with the foliage selected as red and the > analysis result looking reasonable > File 1933.jpg has the sky selected as red, not the foliage; area results > wrong > > i don't understand what's going on. Is there something possibly different > with file 11.jpg and 1933.jpg vs. 61.jpg? How would I figure out what it > is? > > I don't want to have to manually process all 1000 images to get valid > analysis results. > > Larry > > -- Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D Department of Biology Temple University Philadelphia, PA 19122 Voice: 215 204 8839 e-mail: [hidden email] URL: http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs |
In reply to this post by Larry Nolan
On Friday 01 January 2010, you wrote:
> After running the macro on a folder with the three files (attached in > order below): > > File 11.jpg has the sky selected as red, not the foliage; area > results wrong > File 61.jpg appears to be OK with the foliage selected as red and > the analysis result looking reasonable > File 1933.jpg has the sky selected as red, not the foliage; area > results wrong > > i don't understand what's going on. Is there something possibly > different with file 11.jpg and 1933.jpg vs. 61.jpg? How would I > figure out what it is? Yes, I get the same results here. There might be some problem, with the "Default" method while running from a macro. Calling the threshold adjuster and using the Default method seems to find the right phase but not when running from the macro. If you install the Auto_Threshold plugin (which has some extra settings) and change in your macro: setAutoThreshold(); for run("Auto Threshold", "method=Default setthreshold show"); Then the phases seem to be detected properly. The plugin (and some documentation) is here: http://www.dentistry.bham.ac.uk/landinig/software/autothreshold/autothreshold.html Happy 2010 to all G. |
Gabriel,
Thanks for confirming what I was seeing with the interactive vs. macro results. The Auto_Threshold plugin does give dramatically improved results. I'll work with it, trying to tweak the output for the files that have problems like the one I've attached. a good start to 2010! Thanks, Larry On Jan 1, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Gabriel Landini wrote: > On Friday 01 January 2010, you wrote: >> After running the macro on a folder with the three files (attached in >> order below): >> >> File 11.jpg has the sky selected as red, not the foliage; area >> results wrong >> File 61.jpg appears to be OK with the foliage selected as red >> and >> the analysis result looking reasonable >> File 1933.jpg has the sky selected as red, not the foliage; area >> results wrong >> >> i don't understand what's going on. Is there something possibly >> different with file 11.jpg and 1933.jpg vs. 61.jpg? How would I >> figure out what it is? > > Yes, I get the same results here. There might be some problem, with > the > "Default" method while running from a macro. Calling the threshold > adjuster > and using the Default method seems to find the right phase but not > when > running from the macro. > > If you install the Auto_Threshold plugin (which has some extra > settings) and > change in your macro: > > setAutoThreshold(); > for > run("Auto Threshold", "method=Default setthreshold show"); > > Then the phases seem to be detected properly. > The plugin (and some documentation) is here: > http://www.dentistry.bham.ac.uk/landinig/software/autothreshold/autothreshold.html > > Happy 2010 to all > > G. C3P0034C.jpg (32K) Download Attachment |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |