When we were deciding, the only thing that helped was stepping back and doing a painfully honest audit of what we already had. We realized half our environment was built around workloads that didn’t even need the level of flexibility open-source private clouds offer, while the other half needed more customization than a pure hyperconverged appliance could easily give us. What guided us eventually was mapping out the operational effort we were actually willing to support long-term.
Here’s something that helped us frame the discussion:
private cloud consulting — it lays out how they compare open-source platforms to hyperconverged choices in a way that highlights the practical decision points, not just the theoretical. The bit about aligning the design with what the team can realistically maintain hit pretty close to home.
In our case, we ended up doing a hybrid: hyperconverged hardware for predictable workloads and an open-source cloud layer for the weird, fast-changing stuff. It reduced the operational headache without sacrificing flexibility. If your team is split, it might be worth thinking of a solution that doesn’t require you to choose one extreme.