Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
18 posts
|
i need to quantify the dense red color in the image please help me...
-- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
18 posts
|
i need to quantify the dense red color in the image please help me...
-- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
59 posts
|
Hi,
Can you tell us what you need to quantify about the dense red fibers in the image? The number of reddish pixels, the length of the fibers in the imaging field, etc.??? In any case, I recommend starting by splitting the RGB into separate channels, and thresholding the red channel to your liking to identify what you think is signal and exclude the noise... Then, « quantify » based on whatever is physiologically-relevant to your case, but it’s unclear what that is right now. Best, John Le 2 juil. 2013 à 21:32, Thuraya Medhat a écrit : > i need to quantify the dense red color in the image please help me... > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > <image4072-001.jpg> -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
18 posts
|
i need the pixels of the reddish fibers percent to the whole image so i can
quantify how much the fibrosis is On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:41 PM, John Hayes <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > Can you tell us what you need to quantify about the dense red fibers in > the image? The number of reddish pixels, the length of the fibers in the > imaging field, etc.??? > > In any case, I recommend starting by splitting the RGB into separate > channels, and thresholding the red channel to your liking to identify what > you think is signal and exclude the noise... Then, « quantify » based on > whatever is physiologically-relevant to your case, but it’s unclear what > that is right now. > > Best, > > John > > Le 2 juil. 2013 à 21:32, Thuraya Medhat a écrit : > > > i need to quantify the dense red color in the image please help me... > > > > -- > > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > > <image4072-001.jpg> > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > ... [show rest of quote] -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
27 posts
|
In reply to this post by John Hayes
[cid:image001.png@01CE773C.911CCD10]
I used the following macro to quantify the area. There is some artifact due to the edge circle, run("Split Channels"); selectWindow("image4072-001.jpg (green)"); // I like to use green as it is darkest in red, providing best contrast. setAutoThreshold("Default dark"); //run("Threshold..."); run("Measure"); run("Subtract Background...", "rolling=50 light"); setThreshold(155, 227); run("Measure"); My estimation is 121097/1044914, about 11% of area (partial circle). 121097 is the pixel number for the red color, 10440914 is the pixels within the circle. -----Original Message----- From: ImageJ Interest Group [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of John Hayes Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:41 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: quantify the fibers with the red color Hi, Can you tell us what you need to quantify about the dense red fibers in the image? The number of reddish pixels, the length of the fibers in the imaging field, etc.??? In any case, I recommend starting by splitting the RGB into separate channels, and thresholding the red channel to your liking to identify what you think is signal and exclude the noise... Then, « quantify » based on whatever is physiologically-relevant to your case, but it's unclear what that is right now. Best, John Le 2 juil. 2013 à 21:32, Thuraya Medhat a écrit : > i need to quantify the dense red color in the image please help me... > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > <image4072-001.jpg> -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
18 posts
|
first of all thanks alot but i'm alittle confused
i used the green channel as you said cuase it's the best then i did these steps but it didn't give me your result : - image , adjust, threshold - set to 155 ,227 - run subtract background it did't give me these result at all ... please help me ,, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Pang, Zhengyu (GE Global Research) <[hidden email]> Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:57 PM Subject: Re: quantify the fibers with the red color To: [hidden email] [cid:image001.png@01CE773C.911CCD10] I used the following macro to quantify the area. There is some artifact due to the edge circle, run("Split Channels"); selectWindow("image4072-001.jpg (green)"); // I like to use green as it is darkest in red, providing best contrast. setAutoThreshold("Default dark"); //run("Threshold..."); run("Measure"); run("Subtract Background...", "rolling=50 light"); setThreshold(155, 227); run("Measure"); My estimation is 121097/1044914, about 11% of area (partial circle). 121097 is the pixel number for the red color, 10440914 is the pixels within the circle. -----Original Message----- From: ImageJ Interest Group [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of John Hayes Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:41 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: quantify the fibers with the red color Hi, Can you tell us what you need to quantify about the dense red fibers in the image? The number of reddish pixels, the length of the fibers in the imaging field, etc.??? In any case, I recommend starting by splitting the RGB into separate channels, and thresholding the red channel to your liking to identify what you think is signal and exclude the noise... Then, « quantify » based on whatever is physiologically-relevant to your case, but it's unclear what that is right now. Best, John Le 2 juil. 2013 à 21:32, Thuraya Medhat a écrit : > i need to quantify the dense red color in the image please help me... > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > <image4072-001.jpg> -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
23 posts
|
Running "subtract background" after threshholding will not do anything. Try
running that first, then thresholding, that might be your issue. -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
97 posts
|
Hi Thuraya
In brightfield images one SHOULD NOT quantify brightness but density, because the image is formed via absorbtion of certain quantity of light of certain wavelength.It is a very common mistake to treat brightfield images like fluorescence images. In the brightfield image the light passes through the specimen and is absorbed by the different dyes. So the dye that appears red would have absorbed mostly blue and green light, this means that the red dye will be densest (in greatest quantity) at the places where there is no blue or green light passing at all , this is wherever the blue or green pixels are the darkest. In your case the "meaningful" channel would be either BLUE or GREEN but NOT RED. This is so, because the red appearing fibers would have absorbed this colors and left red light pass true - that is why the red channel will be less informative (in this channel you are actually quantifying the green or blue stain which absorbed the red light). That is why you will need to do the thresholding in one of these other channels (chose the one in which the fibers seem denser (darker)). Next in Analyze->Select measurements you should select Area and Area fraction with the Limit to Threshold option checked. Then you run Analyze->Measure (Ctrl+M) and you will receive total thresholded area in pixels and Thresholded area fraction in %. Another aproach would be to Invert the image and than quantify the brightness in the Red channel of the Negative. Stoyan 2013/7/3 Benjamin Grant <[hidden email]> > Running "subtract background" after threshholding will not do anything. Try > running that first, then thresholding, that might be your issue. > > -- > ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html > -- Dr. Stoyan P. Pavlov, MD, PhD Departament of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology Medical University "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov", Varna Prof. Marin Drinov Str.55 9002 Varna Bulgaria Tel: +359 (0) 52 - 677 - 052 e-mail: [hidden email] -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Disable Popup Ads | Edit this page |