http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Re-Image-Processing-Software-tp3682993.html
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 7:02 AM, CONFOCALMICROSCOPY automatic digest system wrote:
>
>> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:41:20 -0400
>> From: Andreas Bruckbauer <
[hidden email]>
>> Subject: Re: Image Processing Software
>>
>> I find the look and feel of imageJ ok, but a serious limitation is that th=
>> e image processing pipeline is not saved with the image and often there is =
>> no undo available.
>
> Undo is a problem, and I think the imageJ2 guys are working on that…?
>
> ...but for having a reproducible pipeline, this is not problem,
> so long as you record your commands with the macro recorder.
> Saving this as a macro is no problem…. but
> the macro is not saved in the result image….
>
> Maybe we could find a way to add the macro to the tiff header or ome metadata….
>
> We would have to listen to each image window and capture all the commands executed on it,
> and also when new image windows are generated also record how they were made…
> and probably some more fiddly cases…
>
> This might require a whole new framework, and I dont know what the
> imageJ2 guys have in mind there…regarding undo etc. #
>
>
>> It is very interesting that Bitplane advertises the Imar=
>> isXT function with: "The plugin allows the exchange of 3D images between Im=
>> aris and ImageJ, thus enabling the use of the powerful image processing abi=
>> lities of ImageJ on Imaris datasets".=20
>
> Nice eh!
>
> Dan
>
>
>>
>> best wishes
>>
>> Andreas
>
Dr. Daniel James White BSc. (Hons.) PhD
Fiji - is just ImageJ (Batteries Included)