Posted by
Michael Schmid on
Oct 03, 2011; 2:10pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/bugs-in-batch-mode-tp3682997p3682998.html
Hi Sanghyun,
hmm, I can't reproduce your problem; this macro runs correctly with
my version of ImageJ (1.45q6):
setBatchMode(true);
run("Blobs (25K)");
setThreshold(126, 255);
run ("Invert");
run("Find Maxima...", "noise=0 output=List exclude");
a=getResult("X", 0);
b=getResult("Y", 0);
print("nResults="+nResults()+" a,b="+a+","+b);
It won't work, however, if your image has no maxima. getResult("X",
0) will result in an error if there is no line 0 in the Results table
because the table is empty.
Michael
________________________________________________________________
On 3 Oct 2011, at 15:26, Kim Sanghyun wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I have two strange phenomena in Batch mode which didn't happen in
> non Batch mode during my macro running.
> At first, roiManager("count") didn't give a right number after run
> ("Analyze Particles...", ..). I guess that it counts the number of
> particles including the rejected particles by the size limitation I
> set. In the present time I resolved this problem by using
> "nResults" instead of using "roiManager("count")".
>
> Second one is...
> to find the pixel position of the maximum intensity which is any
> white place in my binary image, I used this
> run("Find Maxima...", "noise=0 output=List exclude");
> a=getResult("X", 0);
> b=getResult("Y", 0);
> In batch mode, error comes as no result in the table for
> "getResult". I don't know what is the real problem yet, because in
> non batch mode it works well.
>
> Is there anybody who has the same problem and resolved it??
> Thanks,
> Sanghyun.
>
>
> SangHyun Kim (Post-Doc.) Tel. 972-8-9343423
>
[hidden email]
> @ Dep. of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science,
> Rehovot 76100, Israel