Posted by
dscho on
Dec 24, 2010; 10:46am
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Why-Are-Single-Plane-Composite-Images-Not-Suppoted-tp3686102p3686108.html
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Michael Ellis wrote:
> Just received an email from Wayne letting me know about the upcoming
> ImageJ 2.0. This is all news to me, and news makes for a great early
> Christmas present!. Why is there no mention of ImageJ 2.0 on the
> original Image website
http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/ ? Perhaps a note under
> the news section?
My, my. There you get a nice Christmas present, and without a "thank you"
a complaint hits the list?
> I looked at imageJ-dev.org but:
>
> Unfortunately the ij-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar link on the page
>
http://imagejdev.org/resources seems to be broken.
Be patient. The ImageJDev team has enough on their plates already, I am
sure the download link will be fixed in due time. For the moment, it is
not advisable to use ij-2.0-SNAPSHOT unless you are willing to contribute
to that project, as far as I can tell.
> I got the source downloads to work but remain unsure as to whether I
> should be adopting anything now in readiness for ImageJ 2.0. Any advice
> on where to start with ImageJ 2.0 gratefully appreciated.
All this was discussed at length at the ImageJ conference.
As to developing on top of ImageJ2: it is still in a phase where
contributors are most important. Should you decide to become one, you
might be interested in subscribing to the imagejx list, and to read up on
the mails of the last month or so (it's not really a high volume list, so
that's not too much to ask for).
If you're not interested in developing ImageJ2, I would recommend to wait
a little.
Hth,
Johannes