Re: Bug in ImageJ?

Posted by Andreas Maier on Sep 10, 2010; 9:34pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Bug-in-ImageJ-tp3686967p3686970.html

  Hi Gabriel,

in fact I already did answered the P.S. part of this question myself.
The problem (?) is also relevant for the newest version of ImageJ
(version 1.44f9).

The main question, however, was: Will it be fixed or is this behavior on
purpose?
It looks like a typo to me and I fixed (?) it in my personal version of
ImageJ. So you could also suggest that everyone is using his own version
of ImageJ. But this surely not the direction the project should go, right?

Andreas


Am 9/10/2010 2:14 PM, schrieb Gabriel Landini:

> On Friday 10 September 2010 18:51:27 Andreas Maier wrote:
>
>> P.S. Is this problem already fixed in a newer version of ImageJ? We are
>> using ImageJ 1.43u.
> Did you know that you can answer this question yourself by looking at the
> source code of the latest build here?:
>
> http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/source/
>
> G.
>

--
Dr.-Ing. Andreas Maier
Stanford University
Department of Radiology
The Lucas Center for Imaging
Mail Code 5488, Route 8
Stanford, CA  94305
http://med.stanford.edu/profiles/Andreas_Maier/