http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/macro-creating-n-Arrays-within-a-for-loop-tp3688201p3688207.html
with. However, the code is a now a little bit clumsy, especially since I
am not really into programming. Still, it works very fine for my
> Hi Cristophe,
>
> yep, you are right, but I fear, this feature alone would still make any
> code very clumsy,
> what one would really need is some kind "indirection" that really takes a
> string
> variable and interprets it´s contents in the same places (within an
> expression
> and also to the left of the assignment) and the same way as the variable
> that´s
> "in" the string (including indexing... etc.)
>
> Joachim
>
> ImageJ Interest Group <
[hidden email]> schrieb am 07.05.2010
> 13:57:43:
>
>> I think there is an "execute" command in the macro language that reads
>> a string as a command. It is the "eval" function :
>>
>> eval(macro)
>> Evaluates (runs) one or more lines of macro code. An optional second
>> argument can be used to pass a string to the macro being evaluated.
>> See also: EvalDemo macro and runMacro function.
>>
>>
http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/developer/macro/functions.html#eval>>
>> Or maybe I make a confusion ? I used it recently to create a segmented
>> line from an array of coordinates, by concatenating a MakeLine command
>> with all coordinates as a string, and using "eval" to execute it.
>>
>> Christophe
>>
>> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 13:20, Joachim Wesner
>> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>> name = "test " +i;
>> >>> name = newArray(k);
>> >
>> >>Maybe because you are trying to make a variable name that contains a
>> > space.
>> >>Try removing it.
>> >
>> > No, this will only create a new Variable called "name" of type Array,
> the
>> > old string variable "name" will be discarded!
>> >
>> > As long as there is no "execute" statement in the ImageJ Macro
>> language
>> > (Hint! Hint!), that really RE-interprets a string as a new command
>> > (however, if I´m not mistaken here, you would need thsi also in all
> places,
>> > where you need to access one the the multiple arrays,
>> > not only when creating those) you are somewhere out of luck.
>> >
>> > Johannes,
>> >
>> > What I would do in such cases, if you already know the number of
> "arrays" n
>> > outside the loop (can still be a dynamic value that is read from
>> > somewhere on runtime, you could create an array of n-times the single
> size
>> > and use a variable offset in that array.
>> >
>> > (Maybe this is basically what you did?)
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > Joachim Wesner
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________________
>> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> > For more information please visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/email>> > ______________________________________________________________________
>> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/email> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>