Login  Register

Re: problem for close 32 bits image under Linux Ubuntu 9.10 OS

Posted by Philippe GENDRE on Jan 15, 2010; 9:30am
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/problem-for-close-32-bits-image-under-Linux-Ubuntu-9-10-OS-tp3689709p3689713.html

Hi Michael,

Sorry. A part of the information is in the title : OS is Debian Ububtu 9.10.

I think that java is jre 1.6 but I am not sure and I cannot check that from
here for the moment. I could precise this evening.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I meet a problem when I try to close a 32 bits image generates under ImageJ.
I meet the same problem when I try to close Imagej if a 32 bits image is
still open.

The following dialog box appears "Save changes to ...." but clicking on the
buttom (Yes No Cancel) has no effect except closing the dialog box.

I meet this problem with different versions of ImageJ (1.43o6 and 1.42q).

I never encountered this problem with Windows OS versions.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Best,

Philippe

2010/1/15 Michael Schmid <[hidden email]>

> Hi Philippe,
>
> did I miss something - which OS and Java version are you using?
> (please repost to the list with the full information)
>
> Michael
> ________________________________________________________________
>
>
> On 14 Jan 2010, at 21:12, Philippe GENDRE wrote:
>
>  Hello,
>>
>> I meet a problem when I try to close a 32 bits image generates under
>> ImageJ.
>> I meet the same problem when I try to close Imagej if a 32 bits image is
>> still open.
>>
>> The following dialog box appears "Save changes to ...." but clicking on
>> the
>> buttom (Yes No Cancel) has no effect except closing the dialog box.
>>
>> I meet this problem with different versions of ImageJ (1.43o6 and 1.42q).
>>
>> I never encountered this problem with Windows OS versions.
>>
>> Congratulations to all members of the ImageJ community for their works !
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>
>