Posted by
Raymond Martin-2 on
Dec 12, 2009; 3:13pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-development-involvement-contributions-tp3690030p3690064.html
On December 12, 2009 08:15:30 am you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Raymond Martin wrote:
> > Grant,
> >
> > > What I am suggesting is to make it possible to use ImageJ
> > > functionality from within an application built on a rich client
> > > platform, or in an SDI or MDI or tabbed/docking environment. This
> > > would in no way make ImageJ dependent on the RCP or another library.
> >
> > Sure, that can happen once the core is separated from the GUI and so
> > forth. Once that is separate anybody will be able to make whatever
> > client or fork they want no matter how much extra effort it will take.
>
> This is all nice theory. I am still waiting to see the code.
Aren't you involved in coding also?
I never indicated that I would solely be doing this separation of GUI from
core, did I. I have only just begun with AWT to Swing stuff. As I am doing that
I am seeing other things that also need work to make the application better
in various respects.
You will be waiting a long time to see the GUI/core separation if you rely on
me alone (I thought there was a funded team of developers coming together to
work on this application), there are many things that need fixing as well as
that.
All things can be done, but it will take time. Plus you do realize I am doing
this work for free, I am not benefiting personally in any way from these
contributions, I do not use the application in my work directly or indirectly.
So I am sure you can understand that in doing so I am free to contribute
what I want and at a place that suits me.
Regards,
Raymond