Login  Register

Re: downsampling methods

Posted by Gluender-3 on Nov 16, 2009; 10:52am
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/downsampling-methods-tp3690444p3690446.html

Just a note:

Downsampling at least in theory definitely requires a _real_ bandlimit.

That said, Gaussian lowpass filtering surely is not optimum because
per definition it doesn't really zero frequency components above the
Nyquist limit.

>Hi Aviva,
>
>you should try Gaussian downsampling:
>
>In Fiji, there is a Javascript in PLugins->Examples->downsample
>explained at
>
>http://pacific.mpi-cbg.de/wiki/index.php/Downsample
>
>the same Javascript is at the ImageJ website
>
>http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/macros/js/Downsample.js
>
>or, alternatively a public API method in the packages of mpicbg_.jar
>that are part of Fiji, such that you can call it for a nopen Image, say,
>from Plugins->Scripting->BeanshellInterpreter:
>
>import ij.*;
>import mpicbg.ij.util.Filter;
>new ImagePlus( "downsampled", Filter.scale( IJ.getImage().getProcessor(),
>0.2f ) ).show();
>
>Lanczos being just an approximation of a bandpass filter in the
>frequency domain, you could also try to do the downsampling directly
>through that bandpass-filter, ImageJ has the respective functions.
>Depends very much on what you want.  For most cases, the Gaussian thing
>is just optimal.
>
>Best,
>Stephan
>
>
>
>On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:07 +0200, Aviva Vaknin wrote:
>>  Hello all!
>>
>>  I have implemented a Lanczos8 kernel convolution to downsample images
>>  which works well for 30-40 iterations.
>>
>>  After that ringing artifacts enter, even if I reduce a 1600x1200 image one
>>  pixel
>>  each iteration.
>>
>>  Should this be occurring ? Is there a way around it ?
>>  Is there a better down sampling method for this type of problem ?
>>
>>  thanks,
>>  aviva

Best
--

                   Herbie

          ------------------------
          <http://www.gluender.de>