http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Imageflow-Visual-Macro-Editing-Release-1-0-tp3692434p3692435.html
Sorry for bothering again. Yet, ImageFlow does work as standalone, but
> Hello everyone
>
> I wrote my Bachelor thesis about a visual programming solution for
> visually editing ImageJ macros.
> At the beginning of March I released a first Beta of Imageflow.
> I got many encouraging comments, thank you.
> I collected all feedback and tried to incorporate as many as possible for
> the first stable release, which is now ready for download.
>
> Full news on the Imageflow-blog:
>
http://imageflow.danielsenff.de/archives/31-Release-Imageflow-1.0.html>
> Datasheet:
>
http://imageflow.danielsenff.de/imagej/Imageflow.html>
> Download:
>
http://imageflow.danielsenff.de/imagej/imageflow-10.zip>
> Source:
>
http://imageflow.danielsenff.de/imagej/imageflow-sources-10.zip>
>
> Imageflow works as a stand-alone application or as a plugin within
> ImageJ. The program allows to visually construct macro workflows. By
> simple drag and drop you can build an image processing workflow, which is
> translated into and executed as an ImageJ macro.
>
> Units in the application are defined in XML-descriptions. If you think a
> plugin or a function is missing, feel free to add them. The XML
> documentation is available online:
>
http://imageflow.danielsenff.de/imagej/Unit%20XML%20Documentation.html>
>
> Since the beta I fixed many existing bugs. I included new units based on
> the functions ImageJ has already available. Thanks to those who contacted
> me with questions regarding their workflows or their own
> unit-xml-implementation. Also new is collapsing units, so they need less
> screen real estate and it's possible to display a grid and align units to
> it.
>
>
> I will begin work on the next version soon. There are several ideas in
> the room in which direction this project could go: Improving the user
> experience of this version as well as thinking about some major
> restructures on the inside.
>
> I'm a bit undecided about the direction. I'd like to know what use cases
> you see for the program in the future. At the moment, I think it's a
> great tool, but I'm not entirely sure for what purpose exactly.
>
> So I appreciate your feedback. :)
>
> thanks for you attention
> Daniel
>
>
Rund 6 Millionen Leute nutzen SPAMfighter schon.