Login  Register

Re: 1.42m changes more than it should???

Posted by Johannes-P. Koch on Apr 27, 2009; 9:24am
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/1-42m-changes-more-than-it-should-tp3692772p3692774.html

Thanks Wayne for the fast elimination of the problem(s): However, still,
upon splitting images I lose the scaling (px width, height, unit...). This
happens not only with my .lsm files, also when opening the sample image
(HeLa cells) and adding arbitrary values for px width, height and unit.
Not, that this cannot be corrected with a little macro...but I guess, this
is not the intention.

Best
Johannes


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rasband Wayne" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 1:58 AM
Subject: Re: 1.42m changes more than it should???


> On Apr 26, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Johannes-Paul M. Koch wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> maybe my PC is just crap, but upon updating ImageJ to 1.42m some  strange
>> things happen. Reading from .lsm files (HandeExtraFileTypes) still
>> works,
>> but the red is now rather magenta. Splitting colors results in
>> additional
>> loss of the image scaling and remerging them results in an error  stating
>> that hyperstacks are no suitable input for this command (obviously  I did
>> use
>> normal images, exactly those, that the program has just created by  the
>> split
>> command). This happens on WinXP and on Vista...
>> Changing back to 1.41 everything is normal, and I know that with 1.42l
>> everything was fine too, so what has happened?
>
> These bugs should be fixed in v1.42n, which is now available via the
> Help>Update ImageJ command.
>
> -wayne
>
>


--
Ich verwende die kostenlose Version von SPAMfighter für private Anwender,
die bei mir bis jetzt 7227 Spammails entfernt hat.
Rund 6 Millionen Leute nutzen SPAMfighter schon.
Laden Sie SPAMfighter kostenlos herunter: http://www.spamfighter.com/lde