Re: Antwort: Re: Some thoughts about ImageJ ...

Posted by dscho on Mar 10, 2009; 2:35pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Some-thoughts-about-ImageJ-tp3693353p3693357.html

Hi,

On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Joachim Wesner wrote:

> One thing that should/could be adressed when "refactoring" ImageJ
> would/could/SHOULD be the way the FFT or FHT routines are integrated
> into the "kernel".

This is getting too detailed for me.  We are losing focus.

The real issue is, after all: due to historical reasons, ImageJ uses
neither Java5 niceties, nor does it have a completely orthogonal API
(meaning that GUI, data structures and algorithms are not separated from
each other).

The question is: how can we keep the convenience for existing users, as
well as get the changes in that are needed to move ImageJ forward from the
technical side?

Oh, and FWIW I think it would be wrong to move the discussion away from
the ImageJ list, unless you absolutely want to lose contact with the
users...

Ciao,
Dscho