Re: setting up multiple arrays using sequential name.

Posted by grimper on Feb 08, 2009; 8:26am
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/setting-up-multiple-arrays-using-sequential-name-tp3693809p3693811.html

Did you mean using setPixel() and getPixel() to put my data into the new image? But it seems to me that the pixel can only contain integer as value. What if my data contains  decimal places upto 3 or 4?

Thanks a lot for your reply,

_ wrote

Hi,
unfortunately it is not possible to create a more dimensional array but  
you can use a second  image to store your data.

Greetings.


grimper schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to write a macro to analysis multiple image stacks. For each
> stack, the analyzed result would put into an array respectively. As I have n
> stacks, I would need to define n arrays.
> Ex:
> a1 = newArray(nSlices);
> a2 = newArray(nSlices);
> .
> .
> .
> .
> an = newArray(nSlices);
>
> Could I use "for loop" to do this job? Like:
> for (i=1; i<nImages;i++){
>      "a"+i = newArray(nSlices);
> }
>
> I tried this but it seems to me that by concatenating a string and a
> variable couldn't be assigned as the name of array.
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
>
>
>