Re: setting up multiple arrays using sequential name.

Posted by _-3 on Feb 08, 2009; 8:35am
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/setting-up-multiple-arrays-using-sequential-name-tp3693809p3693812.html

Yes  I did.
You can use a RGB image (3*255) cahnnel or a 32-Bit image (
"plain"-decimal ).
If using an RGB image you can multiply your values (*10 or *100 .. ) to
draw the data.

Maybe its also possible to store your data in a table (print .. ).

Greetings


grimper schrieb:

> Did you mean using setPixel() and getPixel() to put my data into the new
> image? But it seems to me that the pixel can only contain integer as value.
> What if my data contains  decimal places upto 3 or 4?
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply,
>
>
>
>
>
> _ wrote:
>  
>> Hi,
>> unfortunately it is not possible to create a more dimensional array but  
>> you can use a second  image to store your data.
>>
>> Greetings.
>>
>>
>> grimper schrieb:
>>    
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to write a macro to analysis multiple image stacks. For each
>>> stack, the analyzed result would put into an array respectively. As I
>>> have n
>>> stacks, I would need to define n arrays.
>>> Ex:
>>> a1 = newArray(nSlices);
>>> a2 = newArray(nSlices);
>>> .
>>> .
>>> .
>>> .
>>> an = newArray(nSlices);
>>>
>>> Could I use "for loop" to do this job? Like:
>>> for (i=1; i<nImages;i++){
>>>      "a"+i = newArray(nSlices);
>>> }
>>>
>>> I tried this but it seems to me that by concatenating a string and a
>>> variable couldn't be assigned as the name of array.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>      
>>    
>
>