Posted by
Emmanuele Sordini on
Jul 11, 2006; 5:05pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Image-quality-evaluation-tp3695062p3695072.html
Hello Thomas,
On 7/11/06, Thomas Boudier <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> As concerns Astronomy i can suggest you to have a look at SalsaJ, a
> derivative from ImageJ that is customized for astronomy, it is
> multilingual and incorporates special features like aperture intensity
> measurement. You can have a look at :
>
http://www.euhou.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7&Itemid=9 Thanks for the link! I was not aware of the HOU initiative. I've just
downloaded the package and I will give it a try as soon as I can.
As about registration for astronomical images we are currently thinking
> of implementing a registration procedure based on classical
> cross-correlation in Fourier Space, but of course you can use TurboReg
> for instance.
Perhaps my first post was not very clear.
I am a long-time user of many software packages, but as such, I didn't care
much about the math background underlying many image processing features.
Now I thought about deepening my knowledge of the subject and dabbling in
some coding to see how the stuff "really" works. Here's why I went for
ImageJ: because it's a Java-based, open architecture, that allows people to
create and experiment with their own solutions.
For image registration, I first tried to use the Bij package: I must say it
works but it's also awfully slower (about an order of magnitude) than
Windows native applications. I will probably give TurboReg a try as well.
Do you have any suggestions as for the image quality indicator?
Thanks,
Emmanuele