Re: ImageJ benchmarks

Posted by ctrueden on
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-benchmarks-tp3697397p3697399.html

Hi Albert,

I thought it was worthwhile to preserve these numbers in some form, so I
created a FAQ entry on the wiki:

http://imagejdocu.tudor.lu/imagej-documentation-wiki/faq/are-there-performance-statistics-to-compare-against-my-system

If you create a better benchmark, it should be easy enough to update the
information there, too.

-Curtis

On Jan 28, 2008 10:05 AM, Albert Cardona <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for your contributions (and time!)
>
> As computers have improved a lot since the benchmark was put together,
> there is a need for a new benchmark for ImageJ and java systems in
> general.
>
> We have noted the following:
>
> 1 - since chips are now so fast, the benchmark depends a lot more on the
> screen refreshing rate -and thus the graphics card- than on the CPU
> itself.
>
> 2 - the benchmark doesn't last enough to trigger dynamic scaling of some
> CPUs, particularly on laptops.
>
> 3 - the benchmark does not consider multithreading, very relevant now
> with multicore CPUs being the norm.
>
>
> Currently, there is no proper way to test how well will a computer
> perform with java applications, particularly java imaging apps like
> ImageJ.
>
> Eventually "we" (Stephan Preibisch, Johannes Schindelin, myself) will
> put together a new one that tests integer performance, floating-point
> performance, screen updating etc. separately.
>
> If anyone has or knows of such a benchmark already, I would appreciate
> email notice of it.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Albert
>
> --
> Albert Cardona
> http://www.mcdb.ucla.edu/Research/Hartenstein/acardona
>