Posted by
Michael Schell on
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-benchmarks-tp3697397p3697400.html
Mandrill wars:
Mac OSX 10.4, dual G4 1.25 GHz 1.3 GB of 2.0 GB DDR allocated to IJ
1.37: 4.2 sec
Mac OSX 10.4, G5 2 GHz 1.2 of 2.0 GB DDR2 allocated it IJ 1.38: 3.5
sec
Mac OSX 10.5, Core duo 1.83 GHz 1.3 of 2.0 GB DDR2 allocated to IJ
1.37: 1.4 sec
XP32 dual Xeon (single cores) 3.6 GHz, high-end Quadro graphics
card, 1.4 of 4.0 GB DDR2 allocated to IJ 1.38: 1.02 sec
Same XP machine as above running XP64, with 5.0 of 8.0 GB DDR2
allocated to IJ 1.38: .812 sec
On Jan 23, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Albert Cardona wrote:
> ImageJ's Plugins - Utilities Benchmark on the Mandril sample image
> (RGB 512x512):
>
> (Best of 3 runs, ImageJ freshly restarted)
>
>
> MacOSX 10.4 java 1.6.0-beta 32-bit on a powerpc G5 2.0 Ghz 1.5 Gb
> SDRAM: 22.8 seconds
>
>
> Ubuntu 7.10 java 1.6.0 64-bit on an intel core 2 quad 2.4 Ghz 4 Gb
> DDR3: 0.741 seconds
>
>
> Ubuntu 7.04 java 1.6.0 32-bit on an intel core 2 duo 2.2 Ghz 2 GB
> DDR2: 0.802 seconds
>
>
>
> The difference is staggering. That G5 is about 2 years old only.
>
> I would appreciate if people posts benchmarks on their machines,
> to get an idea on what is ImageJ (and TrakEM2) going to be run on.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Albert
>
> --
> Albert Cardona
>
http://www.mcdb.ucla.edu/Research/Hartenstein/acardonaMichael J. Schell, Ph.D.
Assist. Professor
Dept. of Pharmacology
Uniformed Services University
4301 Jones Bridge Rd.
Bethesda, MD 20814-3220
tel: (301) 295-3249
[hidden email]