Re: ImageJ benchmarks

Posted by Jon Harman on
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-benchmarks-tp3697397p3697409.html

Windows XP Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4 Ghz .735 sec

I'm surprised at the similarity between the core 2 quads and duos.  
Perhaps the mandrill image is too small.  Image display may be a big
part of the benchmark

Jon
Albert Cardona wrote:
 > ImageJ's  Plugins - Utilities Benchmark on the Mandril sample image
(RGB 512x512):
 >
 > (Best of 3 runs, ImageJ freshly restarted)
 >
 >
 > MacOSX 10.4 java 1.6.0-beta 32-bit on a powerpc G5 2.0 Ghz  1.5 Gb
SDRAM:     22.8 seconds
 >
 >
 > Ubuntu 7.10 java 1.6.0 64-bit on an intel core 2 quad 2.4 Ghz 4 Gb
DDR3:   0.741 seconds
 >
 >
 > Ubuntu 7.04 java 1.6.0 32-bit on an intel core 2 duo 2.2 Ghz 2 GB
DDR2:  0.802 seconds
 >
 >
 >
 > The difference is staggering. That G5 is about 2 years old only.
 >
 > I would appreciate if people posts benchmarks on their machines,
 > to get an idea on what is ImageJ (and TrakEM2) going to be run on.
 >
 > Thanks!
 >
 > Albert
 >