Re: ImageJ benchmarks
Posted by
drix on
Jan 23, 2008; 6:22pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-benchmarks-tp3697397p3697410.html
On MacBook Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo and 2 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM Mac OS
X 10.4.11 (8S2167)
with ImageJ 1.38x and java version "1.5.0_13".
1.5--1.6 s
Drix
On Jan 23, 2008 1:03 PM, Jon Harman <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Windows XP Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4 Ghz .735 sec
>
> I'm surprised at the similarity between the core 2 quads and duos.
> Perhaps the mandrill image is too small. Image display may be a big
> part of the benchmark
>
> Jon
>
> Albert Cardona wrote:
> > ImageJ's Plugins - Utilities Benchmark on the Mandril sample image
> (RGB 512x512):
> >
> > (Best of 3 runs, ImageJ freshly restarted)
> >
> >
> > MacOSX 10.4 java 1.6.0-beta 32-bit on a powerpc G5 2.0 Ghz 1.5 Gb
> SDRAM: 22.8 seconds
> >
> >
> > Ubuntu 7.10 java 1.6.0 64-bit on an intel core 2 quad 2.4 Ghz 4 Gb
> DDR3: 0.741 seconds
> >
> >
> > Ubuntu 7.04 java 1.6.0 32-bit on an intel core 2 duo 2.2 Ghz 2 GB
> DDR2: 0.802 seconds
> >
> >
> >
> > The difference is staggering. That G5 is about 2 years old only.
> >
> > I would appreciate if people posts benchmarks on their machines,
> > to get an idea on what is ImageJ (and TrakEM2) going to be run on.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Albert
> >
>