Login  Register

Re: ImageJ benchmarks

Posted by drix on Jan 23, 2008; 6:22pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-benchmarks-tp3697397p3697410.html

On MacBook Pro 2 GHz Intel Core Duo and 2 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM Mac OS
X 10.4.11 (8S2167)
with ImageJ 1.38x and java version "1.5.0_13".

1.5--1.6 s

Drix

On Jan 23, 2008 1:03 PM, Jon Harman <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Windows XP Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4 Ghz .735 sec
>
> I'm surprised at the similarity between the core 2 quads and duos.
> Perhaps the mandrill image is too small.  Image display may be a big
> part of the benchmark
>
> Jon
>
> Albert Cardona wrote:
>  > ImageJ's  Plugins - Utilities Benchmark on the Mandril sample image
> (RGB 512x512):
>  >
>  > (Best of 3 runs, ImageJ freshly restarted)
>  >
>  >
>  > MacOSX 10.4 java 1.6.0-beta 32-bit on a powerpc G5 2.0 Ghz  1.5 Gb
> SDRAM:     22.8 seconds
>  >
>  >
>  > Ubuntu 7.10 java 1.6.0 64-bit on an intel core 2 quad 2.4 Ghz 4 Gb
> DDR3:   0.741 seconds
>  >
>  >
>  > Ubuntu 7.04 java 1.6.0 32-bit on an intel core 2 duo 2.2 Ghz 2 GB
> DDR2:  0.802 seconds
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > The difference is staggering. That G5 is about 2 years old only.
>  >
>  > I would appreciate if people posts benchmarks on their machines,
>  > to get an idea on what is ImageJ (and TrakEM2) going to be run on.
>  >
>  > Thanks!
>  >
>  > Albert
>  >
>