Re: ImageJ benchmarks

Posted by Albert Cardona on Jan 23, 2008; 6:22pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-benchmarks-tp3697397p3697411.html

> Windows XP Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4 Ghz .735 sec
>
> I'm surprised at the similarity between the core 2 quads and duos.  
> Perhaps the mandrill image is too small.  Image display may be a big
> part of the benchmark
>


As far as I know, the benchmark is single-threaded, which would then
make it dependent on the max speed of a single core. Also the graphics
card, front bus, RAM type, etc. play a role.

Albert

--
Albert Cardona
http://www.mcdb.ucla.edu/Research/Hartenstein/acardona