Posted by
ctrueden on
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-benchmarks-tp3697397p3697412.html
Processor: 2 x 2.66 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
Memory: 5 GB 667 Mhz DDR2 FB-DIMM
Mac OS X 10.4.11, ImageJ v1.39l, java 1.5.0_13 : 0.96 seconds
Same machine, using Parallels v2 build 3214 with 512 MB RAM:
Windows XP, ImageJ v1.39f, java 1.6.0_02 : 1.352 seconds
Ubuntu Gutsy, ImageJ v1.39l, java 1.6.0_03 : 1.014 seconds
Ubuntu Gutsy, ImageJ v1.39l, java 1.5.0_09 : 2.733 seconds
On Jan 23, 2008 11:27 AM, Albert Cardona <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> ImageJ's Plugins - Utilities Benchmark on the Mandril sample image (RGB
> 512x512):
>
> (Best of 3 runs, ImageJ freshly restarted)
>
>
> MacOSX 10.4 java 1.6.0-beta 32-bit on a powerpc G5 2.0 Ghz 1.5 Gb
> SDRAM: 22.8 seconds
>
>
> Ubuntu 7.10 java 1.6.0 64-bit on an intel core 2 quad 2.4 Ghz 4 Gb
> DDR3: 0.741 seconds
>
>
> Ubuntu 7.04 java 1.6.0 32-bit on an intel core 2 duo 2.2 Ghz 2 GB DDR2:
> 0.802 seconds
>
>
>
> The difference is staggering. That G5 is about 2 years old only.
>
> I would appreciate if people posts benchmarks on their machines,
> to get an idea on what is ImageJ (and TrakEM2) going to be run on.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Albert
>
> --
> Albert Cardona
>
http://www.mcdb.ucla.edu/Research/Hartenstein/acardona>