Antwort: ImageJ benchmarks
Posted by
Joachim Wesner on
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-benchmarks-tp3697397p3697414.html
OK, let´s start
No longer up-to-date AMD-XP-3000+ (2.16GHz), WinXP, 768 MB-DDR
3.2sec
Centrino 1.6GHz (Single-Core) Subnotebook, WinXP, 512 MB-DDR
5.0 sec
Joachim Wesner
Albert Cardona
<
[hidden email]
S.ETHZ.CH> An
Gesendet von:
[hidden email]
ImageJ Interest Kopie
Group
<
[hidden email]. Thema
GOV> ImageJ benchmarks
23.01.2008 18:27
Bitte antworten
an
ImageJ Interest
Group
<
[hidden email].
GOV>
ImageJ's Plugins - Utilities Benchmark on the Mandril sample image (RGB
512x512):
(Best of 3 runs, ImageJ freshly restarted)
MacOSX 10.4 java 1.6.0-beta 32-bit on a powerpc G5 2.0 Ghz 1.5 Gb
SDRAM: 22.8 seconds
Ubuntu 7.10 java 1.6.0 64-bit on an intel core 2 quad 2.4 Ghz 4 Gb
DDR3: 0.741 seconds
Ubuntu 7.04 java 1.6.0 32-bit on an intel core 2 duo 2.2 Ghz 2 GB DDR2:
0.802 seconds
The difference is staggering. That G5 is about 2 years old only.
I would appreciate if people posts benchmarks on their machines,
to get an idea on what is ImageJ (and TrakEM2) going to be run on.
Thanks!
Albert
--
Albert Cardona
http://www.mcdb.ucla.edu/Research/Hartenstein/acardona______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________