Posted by
Przemko on
Jul 06, 2007; 9:05am
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Workflow-for-importing-DV-video-tp3698931p3698935.html
OK, here we go.
First of all I noticed that when I use single image, my PSF was based on
46 slices (or so- the default value). I got it down to one (since I have
only one image) and PRESTO, Deconvolve3D works! And it is fast, and it
does not use a lot of memory. So, my conclusion here is that once you go
to real 3D (so more than one image) the plugin falters. Other than that,
it works without a crash.
I used 3D since it said on the plugin page that 3D would supersede 2D.
Now, when I copare the quality of the results, at this point 2D is
vastly superior to 3D. This may of course be due to the fact that I have
to play with the parameters a lot more. But, "just out of the box", 2D
is better, BUT NOT FASTER.
Guys, THANK YOU FOR THE HELP!!!!
Przemko
--
Przemko Tylzanowski Ph.D.
LSD & Joint, box 813-GREEN
O & N
University of Leuven
Herestraat 49
3000 Leuven
Belgium
phone: (32-16)34-61-96
fax : (32-16)34-62-00
Disclaimer:
http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm