Posted by
Bill Mohler on
Mar 16, 2007; 3:57pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/How-to-store-double-values-tp3700031p3700037.html
Thanks, Jeff-
Actually it looks like Wayne has fixeb the problem early this morning in version 1.38m!
We've been you using your trick, too...
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Hardin <
[hidden email]>
Subj: Re: Problem with X-axis rotating Max Intensity 3D Projections
Date: Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:41 am
Size: 1K
To:
[hidden email]
Hi Bill,
I've had the same problem; the only solution was to roll my own
plugins/macros that do a rotation of the whole stack prior to its
projection. Note, however, that this makes for problems with red/cyan
or red/green anaglyphs. The pixel registration, after rotating back,
isn't quite right. :-(
Cheers,
Jeff
----------------------------------------------
Jeff Hardin
Professor, Department of Zoology
Director, Biology Core Curriculum
University of Wisconsin
1117 W. Johnson St.
Madison, WI 53706
voice: (608) 262-9634
fax: (608) 262-7319
email:
[hidden email]
On Mar 15, 2007, at 11:00 PM, IMAGEJ automatic digest system wrote:
> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:49:33 -0400
> From: Bill Mohler <
[hidden email]>
> Subject: Problem with X-axis rotating Max Intensity 3D Projections
>
> I have noticed this problem for several years/versions now, but have
> forgotten to report it until now.
>
> Using the Maximum Intensity selection for 3D Project, I get
> dramatically different results for rotation around the X and Y axes.
> In brief, Y axis looks correct like a MIP should, and X axis looks
> wrong, as though it were "Nearest", or "Minimum" (or something other).
>
> Has anyone else noticed this?
>
> Bill
> --
> -----------------
> William A. Mohler
> Associate Professor
> Dept. of Genetics and Developmental Biology
--- message truncated ---
William A. Mohler
Dept. Genetics & DevBio
UConn Health Center
p: 860-679-1833
c: 860-985-2719