Re: ROI question

Posted by Josh Doe-2 on
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Get-windows-titles-tp3700495p3700500.html

How do you wish to redraw the ROIs? Why not just load the ROI? Or
define the ROI by points you have saved?

I think you need to clarify your question a bit more. Are you using a
plugin or a macro? What data do you have to redraw/restore the ROIs?
-Josh D

On 1/24/07, Michal Lijowski <[hidden email]> wrote:

> How  X and Y coordinates in the ROI name are related to coordinates
> in results table?
>
> Here is an example.
> This is a list of ROIs.
>   Length     Date   Time    Name
> --------    ----   ----    ----
>       500  10-28-05 14:56   0001-0536-0428.roi
>       384  10-28-05 14:56   0002-0530-0431.roi
>       368  10-28-05 14:56   0003-0537-0433.roi
>       388  10-28-05 14:56   0004-0535-0437.roi
>       416  10-28-05 14:56   0005-0533-0430.roi
>       424  10-28-05 14:56   0006-0533-0431.roi
>       372  10-28-05 14:56   0007-0533-0428.roi
>       584  10-28-05 14:56   0008-0535-0438.roi
>
> This is data from results table derived using above ROIs.
>         Area    Mean     X       Y       BX      BY      Width
> Height
> 1       124.672 160.187  198.718 248.278 193.668 241.039 10.217
> 15.791
> 2       69.454  161.425  200.470 246.157 195.061 241.504 10.217
> 9.289
> 3       63.846  167.740  201.033 249.810 197.383 244.290 7.431
> 10.682
> 4       64.493  163.669  203.218 248.640 200.170 241.968 6.038
> 13.004
> 5       76.572  144.614  199.858 248.307 195.990 241.039 7.895
> 13.468
> 6       74.846  148.274  200.196 247.146 195.525 241.039 9.753
> 13.004
> 7       56.081  149.385  198.401 248.713 195.525 241.968 6.502
> 11.611
> 8       125.751 146.027  203.738 247.897 195.990 241.039 15.326  14.862
>
>
> The ROIs were drawn and results were obtained using ImageJ version
> available in October 2005. From the current ImageJ online source code I
> figured out that X and Y coordinates are derived from the coordinates of
> the bounds of the rectangle surrounding ROI and its width and height.
>
> The ROIs were drawn on 16 bit 128x128  grayscale DICOM images, scaled by
> a factor of 3 and with magnifying glass tool focused on the specific
> part of the image.
>
> My intention is to draw the ROIs again on the same images.
>
> I appreciate any hints.
>
> Michal
>