http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Re-Multiple-results-tables-tp3702273p3702274.html
Andy, you are right, you CAN use the File.* functions.
> I can't see an answer to this in the archives; I think I could do with
> something similar to this...
>
> I am constantly using the results table as a medium to listen to the
> response to an external command (controlling a microscope through the ser=
> ial
> port), but I also need the results table to store, well, imaging results
> that will finally be written to a file for subsequent analysis.
>
> One thought I've had is to open and modify a text file. So if I have
> multiple instances similar to this:
>
> run("Set Measurements...", "area redirect=3DNone decimal=3D3");
> area =3D getResult("Area");
> etc...
>
> I'll have all my results stored as variables. I can then open a file and
> append a row of results to this. I guess this can be done with some 'File=
>
> functions'?!? Any ideas?
>
> Many thanks, Andy
>
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:03:40 +0200, Thomas Azzola <
[hidden email]> wr=
> ote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I have to analyse images (with the same process) and I need for each one=
> a
> different result table.
>> My analyze process is in a loop. So,when a result table is created,resul=
> ts
> are added to the result table but it doesn't create a new result
> table(otherly named).
>>
>> How could I do that ?
>>
>> Thomas
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>