the profiles along each radius "by hand". For example:
>Dear Liu:
> I don't know if this could be of help, but
> there is a plug-in called "radial profile" which maybe could help you.
>
> fjam
>
>"Liu, Dongfang (NIH/NIAID) [E]" <
[hidden email]> escribió:
> Dear friends,
>I am new user of Image J.
>I am sorry to bother you.
>I am looking for your help about the analysis of
>"radial intensity distribution" . The radial
>intensity distribution I(r) of the flourescence
>dot was fit for each frame with a nonlinear
>Levenberg-Marquardt routine to the
>Gaussian:I(r)=Io exp(-R^2/w^2) +BG, where R is
>the distance of each pixel to the center of
>mass. The fitting parameters are Io, w, and BG,
>where Io is the peak intensity, BG is the
>background intensity, and w is the measure of
>the width (the Gauss width). It is very
>important for us to get the peak intensity and
>width. some people suggest me to use Plot Profile(Analyze -> Plot.
>But I think the "plot profile" is not good.
>Because the concept of "plot profile"---Displays
>a two-dimensional graph of the intensities of
>pixels along a line within the image. The x-axis
>represents distance along the line and the
>y-axis is the pixel intensity. For rectangular
>selections, displays a "column average plot",
>where the x-axis represents the horizontal
>distance through the selection and the y-axis
>the vertically averaged pixel intensity
>I was confused that how to calculate the "radial
>intensity distribution" in Image Pro Plus or
>Image J or other software. Could you help me?
>Advice would be greatly appreciated.
>I am looking forward to your reply.
>
>Thank you very much.
>Best regards
>df
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: Gabriel Landini
> > Reply To: List IMAGEJ
> > Sent: Friday, March 3, 2006 12:10 PM
> > To: List IMAGEJ
> > Subject: Re: Image transform
> >
> > On Friday 03 March 2006 16:25, Liu, Dongfang (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
> > > Thank you for your help.
> > > Yes, the system is a miroscope. Could you tell what other optics I should
> > > consider to calibrate a image?
> >
> > No, I couldn't because I do not know what
> kind of optics your microscope has.
> >
> > You have to do this:
> >
> > > > You need to put a known
> > > > sized object under your imaging system
> and see how many pixels it spans.
> > > > Then you estimate the size of your pixels
> dividing the known size of your
> > > > object by the number of pixels it occupies.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Gabriel
> >
> >
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>
>LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
>Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto.
>
http://es.voice.yahoo.com