http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-Enhancements-tp3704655p3704657.html
than optimal. I really like the SWT/Eclipse look&feel. Just a personal
feeling... just for a little bit of encouragement.
..............................................<°}))><........
( ( ( ( ( Prof. Philippe Grosjean
..............................................................
Cubbage, Aaron D. wrote:
> Hello ImageJers,
>
> I get a lot of your emails, and usually read them all so
> I don't mind sending in another small message of my own.
> It relates a bit to the "new UI" email I included below...
>
> I am doing development work now to build an advanced UI to work with or
> alongside of ImageJ capabilities.
> It will be a proprietary media stream handling GUI for play back of
> video frame data for still frame analysis.
> The frame rate is quite low, so its ok for Java.
>
> It probably doesn't relate to any of the work the list is doing.
> Also, I won't be able to contribute any of my work to the group.
>
> But the technology I've chosen maybe an upgrade path for the ImageJ
> work.
>
http://www.eclipse.org/swt/> I've skinned ImageJ with SWT, and I'm in the process of merging the
> Image container
> handling for user presentation. This won't affect at all any core
> ImagePlus or plugin
> work, except the Image view will be in this sort of look:
>
>
http://eclipse.org/articles/Article-Image-Viewer/Image_viewer.html>
http://eclipse.org/articles/Article-SWT-images/graphics-resources.html>
http://eclipse.org/articles/main.html#SWT>
> Also how one will navigate ImageStacks will more resemble how one would
> interface with a VCR,
> instead of the current Slider control.
> cheers,
>
> -Aaron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ImageJ Interest Group [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
> xrayimage
> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 12:19 AM
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Re: ImageJ Enhancements
>
> Was this inspired by my request to have ImageJ enhanced. I have been
> searching for someone to do this and now you are going to do it for
> free?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sarel Botha" <
[hidden email]>
> To: <
[hidden email]>
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 6:48 PM
> Subject: ImageJ Enhancements
>
>
> Good Day List,
>
> We have an interest in furthering development of ImageJ and
> concentrating on the following areas:
>
> 1. Conversion into a light-weight applet,
>
> 2. Simplifying the user interface,
>
> 3. Making ImageJ more suitable for general usage as an image
> viewer,
>
> 4. Reorganizing the source tree for development optimization
>
> 5. Integrating multi-platform scanning
>
> We'd like to get as many other developers as possible involved to work
> on these items and any other enhancements they would like to implement.
>
> The idea is to use the current ImageJ source code as the base code for
> all new development. The licensing for all code contributed will remain
> as Public Domain. Last night a project called ImageJA was registered
> with SourceForge. All feature enhancements made to ImageJA will be
> submitted as enhancements to ImageJ. ImageJA will always remain a
> derivative work of Wayne Rasband's ImageJ and all effort will be made to
> preserve this reference.
>
> The project is located at <
http://sourceforge.net/projects/imageja/>
>
http://sourceforge.net/projects/imageja/ and the main web site is at
> <
http://imageja.sf.net/>
http://imageja.sf.net. The project also has two
> mailing lists (one for users and one for development). We have already
> imported the latest stable code into CVS.
>
> We hope we can work together on enhancing the excellent code that has
> been produced thus far.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sarel Botha
>
>