Re: Feret measurements

Posted by Glen MacDonald-2 on
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Feret-measurements-tp5000233p5001243.html

Dear Vit,
Length is automatically selected when you choose a line tool.   pressing 'M' seems to be equivalent to the control-m or command-m for the Measure command.  (That is a new behavior to me.  but I never had any reason to stray from the old command-m.)  You could also threshold and select your particles with the magic wand tool or use Analyze Particles, which might be more efficient than drawing lines, provide Feret and MinFeret, but no straight line length.

Glen MacDonald
        Core for Communication Research
Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center
        Cellular Morphology Core
Center on Human Development and Disability
Box 357923
University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98195-7923  USA
(206) 616-4156
[hidden email]
[hidden email]





On Dec 20, 2012, at 1:03 PM, vitmat <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Dear Glen,
> many thanks for your answer. I went through the manual before, but it didn't
> answer my question.
> Let me put the problem in a different way. Let's focus purely on a diameter
> of a particle. If I want to measure Feret (manually), I'm expecting to
> obtain a "Feret" column filled with values in the output. The "Length"
> column is confusing me. There's no "Length" item in the Set Measurements
> menu. What does the "Length" mean? Is it the length of the line I made
> manually or is it a length of something else? Is Feret refined /
> recalculated length based on the length set manually by me? And thus, is
> Feret more accurate?
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -----
> Vit Matuska
> --
> View this message in context: http://imagej.1557.n6.nabble.com/Feret-measurements-tp5000233p5001240.html
> Sent from the ImageJ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html


--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html