Posted by
ctrueden on
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/ImageJ-1-x-Git-repository-tp5002378p5002409.html
Hi Josh,
> Any reason the commit messages have a date and version number (e.g.,
> "2013.03.21 (1.47n11)") instead of an actual description of the
> changes made?
That fact is unrelated to GitHub, but rather due to Wayne Rasband's
development style. I believe he does not make individual, granular commits,
but rather does a commit corresponding to each daily build.
Regards,
Curtis
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Josh Doe <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Johannes Schindelin <
>
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > For lurkers, the (read-only) URL is:
> >
> > git://github.com/fiji/imagej1
>
>
> A bit OT: I didn't realize code was hosted/mirrored on GitHub; glad to see
> it there. Any reason the commit messages have a date and version number
> (e.g., "2013.03.21 (1.47n11)") instead of an actual description of the
> changes made? I'm just asking because I've never seen this before in other
> repositories, and wondering if it is an artifact of moving the repository
> to GitHub or something else.
>
> -Josh
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>
--
ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html