> that destroys the original data. What's is apparently saved is the
> image data, that is, it's reduced to BufferedImage.
that they are talking about the pixels, which you say were saved correctly.
into a TIFF header.
> >> Why not just save the images in TIFF format? Why invent another file
> format?
>
>
> When I saw that I could save the files as TIFF I gave it a try but that
> destroys the original data. What's is apparently saved is the image data,
> that is, it's reduced to BufferedImage. That was a disappointing
> exercise.
>
> I know that it is possible for a TIFF file to have the original data in it
> but AFAIK Fiji doesn't support writing this Scientific data mode, alas.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rasband, Wayne (NIH/NIMH) [E] <
[hidden email]>
> Date: Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Best path to take
> To: Robert Lockwood <
[hidden email]>
>
>
> Dear Robert,
>
> Why not just save the images in TIFF format? Why invent another file
> format?
>
> Best regards,
>
> -wayne
>
>
> On Oct 10, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Robert Lockwood wrote:
>
> > Johannes, thanks for your help with my initial attempt to write a plugin.
> >
> > Before I proceed I am asking you and others in the group for some advice.
> >
> > My situation is that we are developing a camera system for in house
> > infrared photography, primarily of wild fires. At this point I need to
> be
> > able to provide a way for others to view our image data and thought that
> > Fiji would be a good solution.
> >
> > I've decided that our images will all have a metadata header and the
> first
> > 24 bytes would be identical in function. Our image data is all (C-talk
> > here) unsigned shorts with the 12-14 bits of precision depending on the
> > camera and are monochrome.
> >
> > The size varies greatly among the cameras with a probable minimum of 512
> > lines by 640 pixels up to 11 megapixels. The image data for most of the
> > cameras are very low contrast unless fire is in the image and consist of
> > raw DN values.
> >
> > The common part of the header, the minimum information for the image to
> be
> > displayed, is" Offset-to-image-data, number-of-lines,
> > number-of-samples-per-line, pixel-size, and time-of-acquisition (Java
> date
> > time in ms). The first four data are Java ints, and the time is a Java
> > long for a total of 24 bytes.
> >
> > I'd like to tell the few people who need to view the images to just
> > download and install Fiji on their LINUX, Macs, and Windows machines, and
> > then how to load and use the plugin/macro I supply. The object is for
> the
> > user to use Fiji to browse and display our files (possible extension
> > .rawimage) and not need to enter any image metadata as they may not know
> > those data. Once the image is in Fiji it can be manipulated, saved-as,
> > etc. In essence it should work analogous to importing a raw image
> without
> > needing to input metadata by hand.
> >
> > TIA for any insight, pointers, etc.
> >
> > Nate
> >
> > --
> > When I was 12 I thought I would live forever.
> > So far, so good.
> >
> > --
> > ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>
>
>
>
> --
> When I was 12 I thought I would live forever.
> So far, so good.
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>