Re: Problem with ROI names in Results table label: new bug?

Posted by Rasband, Wayne (NIH/NIMH) [E] on Oct 28, 2013; 6:06pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Problem-with-ROI-names-in-Results-table-label-new-bug-tp5005350p5005356.html

On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:55 AM, Christophe Leterrier wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There seems to be a newly appeared bug in the transfer of ROI names to the
> Results Table labels. I have macros that use ROIs stored in the ROI manager
> with appended characters at the end of their names (to make something like
> a label/category system). For example a ROI on a stack would be called
> [0047-0066-0060] in the ROI manager, and after processing it would be
> called [0047-0066-0060-10-1-1]. When measuring such a ROI, the label in the
> Results Table is usually [Image Name:ROI name:slice label].
>
> However with the latest version of IJ, when I measure such a ROI, the label
> in the Results Table has the ROI name truncated, i.e. appears as
> [0047-0066-0060-10...] instead of [0047-0066-0060-10-1-1] for the ROI name
> part.
>
> If you want to reproduce, you can open the bat cochlea volume example
> stack, create a ROI on any slice, store it in the ROI manager (name
> [ZZZZ-XXXX-YYYY]) then rename this ROI into [ZZZZ-XXXX-YYYY-10-1-1] using
> the ROI manager, and measure it with the Labels option on: the ROI name
> will appear as [ZZZZ-XXXX-YYYY-10...] in the Results label.
>
> This is unfortunate, as downstream of this, one of my other macros
> processes the Results table based on the detection of the appended numbers
> in the ROI names. Is it possible to fix this, if it is an unintended
> behavior?

This v1.48a regression is fixed in the latest ImageJ daily build (1.48f4).

-wayne

--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html