http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/TrakEM2-registration-of-new-images-tp5005767p5005785.html
> On Dec 2, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Ashwin <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Albert,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. For my purposes approach A may not work as the
> new images are a few additional tiles that are part of existing layers.
> Having them at the end of the volume may not work. Approach B is more
> promising, I had a few questions about this.
>
> - Do I keep the older images locked in the new Save As project?
> - If not, after re-registering all tiles does the "send to -sibling.." send
> the treelines to the coordinates with old transformations? I guess, I don't
> understand how having the same IDs ensures that the treelines get updated
> with the new transformations?
Don't lock the images if you want the best possible tranformations, and the transfer of the treeline is done by concatenating first the inverse of the tranform under the image in the old with the tranform under the same image (by id) in the new Trakem2 project.