I wouldn’t bother blurring - I would just black out a rectangle covering the offending text. That makes it clearer what has been done to the image.
> Hi,
>
> I suggest to keep it simple. Select that region and either smooth it repeatedly or blur it with a higher sigma value. If the patient ID is always at the same spot, you can even automize it.
>
> Regards,
> Johannes
>
>
> *Dr. Johannes Koch*
>
> *Tissue Med Biosciences GmbH*
>
> Magnesitstrasse1 | A-3500 Krems
>
> T: +43/2732/87470-300 | M:
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>
>
> *www.tmbiosciences.com <
http://www.tmbiosciences.com/>*
>
> Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Information. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte unverzüglich den Absender und vernichten Sie diese E-Mail sofort. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser E-Mail sind nicht gestattet.
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
>
> Am 13.02.2014 08:32, schrieb Happy:
>> Hi i want to remove unwanted images such as words(white 255) from my image,
>> but i do not want my main image to be affected. For example, loss of white
>> patches of my main images.
>>
>> lets say there is a tumour in the middle, i want to get rid of the patient
>> ID.
>>
>> Please help. Thank You.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
http://imagej.1557.x6.nabble.com/Edge-detection-tp5006509.html>> Sent from the ImageJ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> --
>> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>>
>
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html