Posted by
ctrueden on
Mar 05, 2014; 7:59pm
URL: http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/32-bit-DICOM-images-issue-tp5006783p5006791.html
Hi Peter,
> I just noticed that when I try to open a 32 bit image without a
> Transfer Syntax specified in the header (in this case is implicit
> little endian by default) the images are not showed properly but
> it works when the transfer syntax is set to big endian.
Which DICOM plugin are you using? Bio-Formats? If so, you can upload a
sample DICOM to:
http://qa.openmicroscopy.org.uk/qa/upload/Then write a mail to ome-users (
http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/ome-users/) asking the
Bio-Formats team to fix the problem.
Regards,
Curtis
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Peter Mc
<
[hidden email]>wrote:
> Hi everyone;
>
> I just noticed that when I try to open a 32 bit image without a Transfer
> Syntax specified in the header (in this case is implicit little endian by
> default) the images are not showed properly but it works when the transfer
> syntax is set to big endian.
> I have tried importing as raw the DICOM files without a specified syntax
> with a proper offset (avoiding DICOM header) and checking the Little-endian
> byte order option and its works. so am I doing something wrong?
> I know 32 bit is not DICOM standard, could be the DICOM reader?
>
> Also I tried with 16 - bit images with different transfer synthases and
> there is no problem.
>
> Thank you in andvace.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://imagej.1557.x6.nabble.com/32-bit-DICOM-images-issue-tp5006783.html> Sent from the ImageJ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html>
--
ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html