http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Stack-operations-overhaul-tp5007162p5007178.html
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose some small changes and upgrades to the way ImageJ/Fiji
> manipulates stacks. I'm quite aware that most ImageJ developers are focused
> on higher-level stuff and that the most likely answer will be "it's open
> source, code it yourself", but I'm unfortunately still unable to do it for
> now. I nonetheless think these would make day-to-day use of ImageJ more
> easy, so I ask.
>
> The behavior of various stack tools (Image>Stacks>Tools in Fiji, don't
> know which ones are preset in vanilla ImageJ) is a bit inconsistent at the
> moment, regarding slice labels. I'm talking about these (maintained by
> Jean-Yves):
http://fiji.sc/Stack_Manipulation. "Concatenate" keeps the
> labels form the input stacks, but "Interleave" does not. Would it be
> possible to update the various tools so that they always keep the labels
> when possible?
>
> Also, it would be nice if Colors>Split Channels was able to keep the slice
> labels too, maybe adding a suffix like -Ch00, -Ch01 etc. in the respective
> output stacks, rather than just removing all labels.
>
> Lastly, the way Stacks>Images to Stack deals with images of different
> sizes is great (detecting them and offering to unify canvas size with
> various options). Would it be possible to have the same options in
> File>Import>Image Sequence, in order to be able to import a whole folder
> with varying image sizes the same way?
>
I'll look into it. Christophe is right, these are heavily used tools in
most users everyday scientific life. Are the original authors around?