http://imagej.273.s1.nabble.com/Import-Image-Sequence-Contrast-Bug-DM3-tp5009816p5009818.html
I see! Thank you for your explanation.
an 16bit image. Unfortunately it does not support different
on the global histogram?).
However, your answer clarified much for me. Thanks!
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> if you convert from 16 to 8 bits you can select in Edit>Options>Conversions:
>
> "Scaled when converting"=off means that the 16-bit value will be transferred 1:1 to the 8-bit value, and everything above 255 will become 255 in the 8-bit image. Typically, this will lead to a lot of saturated pixels, so one would divide the 16-bit image by some number before conversion to 8 bits in that case, to get a reasonable 8-bit display.
>
> "Scaled when converting"=on means that the current display range (as set in the Image>Adjust>Brightness&Contrast panel) determines the span from 0 to 255 of the 8-bit image.
>
> If you have "Scaled when converting"=on and different B&C settings when converting, you get different results.
>
> See the manual:
>
>
http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/docs/guide/146-28.html#toc-Subsection-28.1>
http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/docs/guide/146-27.html#toc-Subsubsection-27.13.11>
>
> Michael
> ________________________________________________________________
> On Sep 29, 2014, at 18:42, Thorsten Wagner wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I currently working with TEM image data. I imported a series of dm3
> > images via the Import -> Image Sequence command.
> >
> > If I open a single image of that image series with Open -> Image it
> > seems to have another contrast:
> >
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/560426/contrast_bug_16bit.png> >
> > But the pixel values are the same in left (sequence) and the right
> > (single) image, so there is not a problem. However, the images are 16bit
> > images and I have to convert them to 8 bit. I do that with "Image ->
> > Type -> 8bit". But now the pixel values are DIFFERENT:
> >
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/560426/contrast_bug_8bit.png> >
> > The marked pixel has in the left image a value of 22 and in the right
> > image a value 8. It think this must be a bug because this is not the
> > expected behaviour, isn't it?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Thorsten
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html